TrustRadius

Firecracker vs. Linux Containers LXD

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Firecracker
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Firecracker is an open source virtualization technology that is purpose-built for creating and managing secure, multi-tenant container and function-based services. Firecracker enables users to deploy workloads in lightweight virtual machines, called microVMs that may provide security and workload isolation over traditional VMs, while enabling the speed and resource efficiency of containers. Firecracker was developed at Amazon Web Services with the goal of improving services like AWS Lambda…N/A
LXD
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
LXD is a system container and virtual machine manager. It offers a unified user experience around full Linux systems running inside containers or virtual machines. LXD is image based and provides images for a wide number of Linux distributions. It supports various use cases, with support for different storage backends and network types and the option to install on hardware ranging from an individual laptop or cloud instance to a full server rack. LXD is written in Go. It is free software…N/A
Pricing
FirecrackerLinux Containers LXD
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FirecrackerLXD
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FirecrackerLinux Containers LXD
Considered Both Products
Firecracker

No answer on this topic

LXD
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose LXD
Linux Containers LXD feels like a more primitive version of docker, docker-compose and similar projects from the docker ecosystem. The Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml methods of specifying a container setup, as well as the network and file configurations afforded by Docker …
Features
FirecrackerLinux Containers LXD
Server Virtualization
Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
Firecracker
6.4
Ratings
23% below category average
Linux Containers LXD
-
Ratings
Virtual machine automated provisioning6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management console8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Live virtual machine backup6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Live virtual machine migration7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Hypervisor-level security5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FirecrackerLinux Containers LXD
Small Businesses
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.6 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FirecrackerLinux Containers LXD
Likelihood to Recommend
4.0
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FirecrackerLinux Containers LXD
Likelihood to Recommend
While deploying workloads in lightweight microVMs presents a couple of perks, Firecracker may not be the best software to handle this. Startup times are slow and scalability is quite limited because of the jailer and virtualization barriers. We have had security breaches on isolated EC2 instances while using Firecracker. It however has a silver lining by improving how serverless functions in container ecosystems are run with their VMMs.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Scenarios where you need an authentication server, a GIT repository the system works very well 'cause you don't need any scalability and the ease to configure and share the same Linux system image across the containers and the rollback process is quick. I didn't put any critical applications there not because of the limitations but due to a company policy.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
  • It makes it easy to secure virtual machines as they are segmented into microvms with a minimal attack surface area
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • GIT repositories.
  • Authentication servers.
  • Application instances.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
  • Excludes devices unnecessarily
  • Has a slow startup time the basis being to improve security which is quite irrelevant.
  • It has limited functionalities on monitoring VMs despite being an open source.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Ease of use.
  • Copying containers from one machine to another.
  • Creation of containers with config files similar to Docker.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Linux Containers LXD feels like a more primitive version of docker, docker-compose and similar projects from the docker ecosystem. The Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml methods of specifying a container setup, as well as the network and file configurations afforded by Docker make working with containers much easier and more reproducible than with Linux Containers LXD.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Low memory overhead on each microVM
  • We can run workloads from different customers on the same machine.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Quicker development cycles.
  • Reduced need for different physical machines or servers.
  • Standardized development environment.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots