TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FitNesse

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AFitNesse is an open source fully integrated standalone wiki web server and acceptance testing framework.N/A

    WebdriverIO

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/AWebdriverIO, an OpenJS Foundation project, is a next-gen browser and mobile automation test framework for Node.js. It can be run on the WebDriver Protocol for true cross-browser testing as well as Chrome DevTools Protocol for Chromium based automation using Puppeteer.N/A
    Pricing
    FitNesseWebdriverIO
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FitNesseWebdriverIO
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FitNesseWebdriverIO
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    FitNesseWebdriverIO
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FitNesseWebdriverIO
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FitNesseWebdriverIO
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    Useful and straightforward. Appian and other low-code BCM tools can be easily integrated. Writing a script for a test is similar to writing a script in English. So simple to use because it's a wrapper class for selenium. FitNesse is being implemented with the goal of doing it correctly the first time. As a result, migrations of both the client and the server are made easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Best suited where frontend developments are in React and where BDD and TDD test frameworks are to be used. Its syntax is very easy to write and understand. Even the non-programmer can do the initial setup. Not suited when the language you are using is other than Javascript(or Typescript).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Easy to install.
    • Command language is easy to create custom scripts.
    • FitNesse tests are deterministic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • numerous integrations to tools
    • fast easy location of page elements
    • tool setup is amazing - they have a script to walk you through everything with prompts!!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Logging can help any debug or error issues.
    • A Java/Selenium developer is needed to maintain the FitNesse keyword library.
    • Content.txt and properties.txted need to be added to the test suite in older versions to make it visible in a test run.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • wdio.conf can contain too much where everything is encapsulated there, like the before and after functions
    • A data provider-like testing would be useful. The only way to input different data into the same test is via a loop
    • everything is needed to be done using the 'browser' object. Can be limiting where you don't have access to the browser depending on where you are in the code
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    The FitNesse testing automation framework is very simple to operate. It is simple to connect with the Jenkins and Bamboo environments. It is dependable, and it is simple and quick to include new tests. The process of debugging and fixing test failures is straightforward. FitNesse, including its installation, may be utilized with a minimum of fuss and difficulty. Maintaining scripts and monitoring their output is designed to be a relatively straightforward process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Other tools we selected don't work in our application, it does or doesn't support multiple frames or need more tweaking just to make it works. When testing out WebdriverIO it just works as expected, no need to do such walk around to make it works multiple frames. It also can handle multiple tabs and windows.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • It does not necessitate any further setup or configuration.
    • FitNess is an easy-to-use manual QA tool with a comprehensive report that aids stakeholders in better understanding the tested applications.
    • Automated testing suites for a wide range of websites. In addition, it is quite beneficial for the ongoing maintenance of the test library.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • It helped in cross browser testing
    • It helped in automating multiple browsers at a time.
    • Code coverage is optimum as this supports Javascript(Typescript)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots