FortiCNAPP vs. Qualys VMDR
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FortiCNAPP | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | FortiCNAPP is an enterprise Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms solution that unifies security posture management, developer code scanning, cloud identity governance, and runtime threat detection into a single management console. FortiCNAPP represents the evolution of Fortinet's cloud security portfolio following its acquisition of Lacework in August 2024. Formerly marketed as Lacework FortiCNAPP, the platform incorporates Lacework's foundational polygraph behavioral analysis engine… | N/A |
Qualys VMDR | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | Qualys VMDR 2.0 with TruRisk gives enterprises visibility and insight into cyber risk exposure with the goal of making it easy to prioritize vulnerabilities, assets, or groups of assets based on business risk. Security teams can take action to mitigate risk, helping the business measure its true risk, and track risk reduction over time. | N/A |
| FortiCNAPP | Qualys VMDR | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FortiCNAPP | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 7 Answers | 86% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| FortiCNAPP | Qualys VMDR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FortiCNAPP | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Score8.9 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Microsoft Defender for Cloud Score8.7 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FortiCNAPP | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.4 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Configurability | - | 9.0 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 9.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.0 |
| FortiCNAPP | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |



