FortiCNAPP vs. Veracode
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FortiCNAPP | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | FortiCNAPP is an enterprise Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms solution that unifies security posture management, developer code scanning, cloud identity governance, and runtime threat detection into a single management console. FortiCNAPP represents the evolution of Fortinet's cloud security portfolio following its acquisition of Lacework in August 2024. Formerly marketed as Lacework FortiCNAPP, the platform incorporates Lacework's foundational polygraph behavioral analysis engine… | N/A |
Veracode | Score8.5 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine. | N/A |
| FortiCNAPP | Veracode | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Developer pricing options available | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FortiCNAPP | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 7 Answers | 92% Would buy again 128 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 90 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | 95% Happy with the feature set 132 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 76 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 86% Implementation went as expected 101 Answers | |
| FortiCNAPP | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Score8.9 out of 10 | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Microsoft Defender for Cloud Score8.7 out of 10 | Checkmarx Score7.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FortiCNAPP | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.3 |
| Usability | - | 5.5 |
| Availability | - | 7.3 |
| Performance | - | 2.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 5.5 |
| Configurability | - | 6.4 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 4.5 |
| Ease of integration | - | 6.4 |
| Product Scalability | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.2 |
| FortiCNAPP | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Veracode Screenshots |








