Mirror Backup vs. Microsoft System Center

Microsoft System Center

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Mirror Backup	Score 6.0 out of 10	N/A	Mirror Backup protects users from data loss by continuously monitoring files and folders, and backing them up to the cloud, a network share, or local drive when they change. It does this in a background service that does not require a user to be logged in - presented as ideal for company servers. It can also keep incremental backups, for when users want a history of each file's changes. The vendor states this design is more desirable than whole-disk backups for some situations. And if the…	$3 per month
Microsoft System Center	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	Microsoft System Center Suite is a family of IT management software for network monitoring, updating and patching, endpoint protection with anti-malware, data protection and backup, ITIL- structured IT service management, remote administration and more. It is available in two editions: standard and datacenter. Datacenter provides unlimited virtualization for high density private clouds, while standard is for lightly or non-virtualized private cloud workloads.	$1,323 per month

Pricing

Mirror Backup

Microsoft System Center

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Standard Edition: $1323
Datacenter Edition: $3607

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Mirror Backup	Microsoft System Center
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

24/7 file protection is available for as little as $0.80 per month. This rate is for a yearly subscription of 30+ seats. The most expensive option, 1 seat/monthly, is $3 per month. Mirror Backup will work with any existing cloud, or local storage can be used.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Mirror Backup	Microsoft System Center

Best Alternatives
	Mirror Backup	Microsoft System Center
Small Businesses	Cove Data Protection Score 9.8 out of 10	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	Bacula Enterprise Score 9.5 out of 10	No answers on this topic
Enterprises	Bacula Enterprise Score 9.5 out of 10	No answers on this topic
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Mirror Backup	Microsoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (21 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (2 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Mirror Backup	Microsoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend	Gammadyne Corporation No answers on this topic	Microsoft For companies with more than 10 Windows devices and needing to standardize the OS, AV, access, share resources, and install software. SCCM is the way to go. This software is unnecessary if the business is all remote users and not in an office-type setting. There are cloud offerings or none to accomplish what a business needs. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Gammadyne Corporation No answers on this topic	Microsoft Allows the grouping of devices by user. Allows controlling updates being deployed to user devices. Allows for the repurposing of machines by being able to load new or updated software on machines that already are in the system. Allows us the ability to wipe a machine clean and restore it back to the configuration that was assigned the machine. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Gammadyne Corporation No answers on this topic	Microsoft Needs web based storefront for requesting new software Needs ability to manage the packaging work flow better Sometimes is slow to download and there is no indication the entire catalog is being loaded, resulting in confused users not being able to find common software in the available list. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Gammadyne Corporation No answers on this topic	Microsoft It is not user-friendly for the most part. With IT infrastructure, sometimes it cannot handle excess requests. Every few months, you will need an upgrade in terms of server resources to keep up with incoming alerts and requests. This does not happen all of the time, but it does happen when there are too many requests. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Gammadyne Corporation No answers on this topic	Microsoft If I had to dislike something about the system it would be how much it changes once you upgrade. This could be more of a problem of mine since I get used to one way and don't like it when it changes so much. I am enjoying the newest update, but it is a mess when you are actually going through the upgrades. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Gammadyne Corporation No answers on this topic	Microsoft We previously used a mix of FOG and Clonezilla to image machines. The biggest issues with these products is that changing one piece of the image required you to rebuild the entire image itself. These pieces of software also did not allow you to manage applications and Windows Updates, causing IT to have to constantly touch machines after they were imaged and update or manage them with a much more hands on approach. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Gammadyne Corporation No answers on this topic	Microsoft We have been able to automate our patch management, firmware and other security concerns. We have a standardized "image" ensuring our setup is consistent across the enterprise. This alone has saved us in time to support and time to understand how to use our desktops. Incentivized Mark Fitzgerald Adjunct Professor Read full review
ScreenShots	Mirror Backup Screenshots