Gavagai Explorer is a text analysis tool for companies that want to keep track of what their customers think – regardless of which language they speak. Explorer analyzes texts in 47 languages. The texts get automatically analyzed and the results are presented in interactive and share-able Dashboards. Gavagai understands meaning The majority of the text data it analyzes comes from sources such as surveys, reviews, emails, chat conversations, and social…
$3,000
Time used to Set Up
Pytorch
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Pytorch is an open source machine learning (ML) framework boasting a rich ecosystem of tools and libraries that extend PyTorch and support development in computer vision, NLP and or that supports other ML goals.
N/A
Pricing
Gavagai
Pytorch
Editions & Modules
Small - 3 project slots -1200 credits
€ 120 per month - More or extra credits can be purchased
Number of Texts Analyzing, number of seats, number of projects
Medium - 10 project slots - 1200 credits
€ 400 per month - More or extra credits can be purchased
Number of Texts Analyzing, number of seats, number of projects
Large - 50 project slots - 1200 credits
€ 2,000 per month - More or extra credits can be purchased
Number of Texts Analyzing, number of seats, number of projects
The Entire Web Application
$3000.00
Time used to Set Up
Enterprise
quote: https://www.gavagai.io/request-quote/
Number of Texts Analyzing, number of seats, number of projects
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Gavagai
Pytorch
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Buy extra credits at any time
Bought credits never expire
Gavagai is well suited for a B2C business that receives a lot of customer feedback in a form of open-ended text. It makes life easier for the customer experience team to efficiently identify the strengths and areas of improvement for the business. It saves a lot of time and also the hassle of analysing text data manually. It is not just a word cloud tool that shows you the words with the most number of mentions. Gavagai directs you towards actionability.
They have created Pytorch Lightening on top of Pytorch to make the life of Data Scientists easy so that they can use complex models they need with just a few lines of code, so it's becoming popular. As compared to TensorFlow(Keras), where we can create custom neural networks by just adding layers, it's slightly complicated in Pytorch.
The big advantage of PyTorch is how close it is to the algorithm. Oftentimes, it is easier to read Pytorch code than a given paper directly. I particularly like the object-oriented approach in model definition; it makes things very clean and easy to teach to software engineers.
I didn't evaluate many options while choosing Gavagai, I had explored a few local vendors whose capabilities were either incomplete or were not up to the mark. Their customer support was also quite poor. Also, the tool was debugged enough which led to frequent crashing. Alchmer although is not a direct competitor to Gavagai, since it's more of a customer feedback tool with additional capabilities of text analytics. I found Alchemer to be extremely expensive. Zonka on the other hand was quite welcoming to feedback from me and promised to develop additional capabilities for my specific requirements although the plan didn't go through due to internal reasons.
Pytorch is very, very simple compared to TensorFlow. Simple to install, less dependency issues, and very small learning curve. TensorFlow is very much optimised for robust deployment but very complicated to train simple models and play around with the loss functions. It needs a lot of juggling around with the documentation. The research community also prefers PyTorch, so it becomes easy to find solutions to most of the problems. Keras is very simple and good for learning ML / DL. But when going deep into research or building some product that requires a lot of tweaks and experimentation, Keras is not suitable for that. May be good for proving some hypotheses but not good for rigorous experimentation with complex models.