geoSCOUT vs. Peloton

There are really only 2 tools in industry that have the function of geoSCOUT (the other being Accumap.) Both are similar. I'd recommend geoSCOUT for project/area specific work. I'd recommend Accumap for start-up companies who are trying to establish their 'playground' as it's easier to navigate province wide assets, whereas new maps are required for geoSCOUT.

Incentivized

• Well ticket information.
• Spatial analysis.
• Query effectiveness.

Incentivized

• Cross sections are not always that visually appealing. Cross sections from Petrel look much better.

Incentivized

Accumap is also a similar tool. The two tools contain the same information, although geoSCOUT has extra modules which have been somewhat useful. For the most part, engineers pull raw production, completions and facilities data. geoSCOUT is better for visualizing plans and allowing toggling of different considerations using the layer manager.

Incentivized

• Allowed for efficient information gathering thereby decreasing turnaround time on projects.
• Helpful for competitor analysis.

Incentivized