gINT vs. MiVu

Suitable for all organisations that are required to collate, store and generate borehole site logs in a timely and orderly fashion. Can also be used for the storage of .ags data if setup correctly. Handles multiple projects well but is not without hiccups when used regularly. I believe it is possible to draw section views however have not done so myself.

Incentivized

• Borehole logs
• Storage of geotech data.
• Customisable

Incentivized

• Bugs bugs bugs.
• Confusing interface.
• Split-logs cumbersome to generate.

Incentivized

I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, Holebase feels like a bespoke piece of software.

Incentivized

• Central piece of software for collation and storage of all site data.
• Storage and checker of ags data.
• Professional looking logs.

Incentivized