GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
GoDaddy supported container management and container-as-a-service products, including (since 2016) ElasticHosts and Springs.io (e.g. Elastic Containers), are discontinued under those brands as of June 2020. However, GoDaddy development services, SDKs, and other projects are now hosted at GoDaddy Engineering and some are available open source.N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
Pricing
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOracle WebLogic Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOracle WebLogic Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSprings.io is unlike other cloud hosting providers. Our reactive servers dynamically resize based on demand, and you only pay for your consumption, not your provisioning. This means you can save money and not sacrifice performance.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOracle WebLogic Server
Features
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOracle WebLogic Server
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
-
Ratings
Oracle WebLogic Server
8.1
36 Ratings
1% above category average
IDE support00 Ratings6.032 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings9.034 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings7.036 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings8.535 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings8.036 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOracle WebLogic Server
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.5
(43 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Discontinued Products
Unlike other providers, Springs doesn’t use a pre-built container solution, instead opting for their own software built from the ground up.
Read full review
Oracle
If you need to have complex options in place you can count on Weblogic to be a robust Applicational Server you can rely on. But you would need to keep an eye on maintaining the framework updated quite frequently to avoid security breaches and subsequent severe situations. If you don't have other infrastructure for test purposes, I wouldn't advise you on having devs and QA installing this heavy application in their local machines, there are other lightweight solutions that would be a better fit for that.
Read full review
Pros
Discontinued Products
  • Container hosting, cloud virtualization
  • Elastic capacity scaling and pay-per-use billing
  • Linux kernel containerization technologies for container isolation and control
Read full review
Oracle
  • The brand relation between Java and WebLogic Application Server usually provides a quicker access to programming features and their availability for the applications deployed.
  • The access to centralized configuration both from console and command line WLST eases the implementation of changes major or not in an organized and expedite way.
  • The maturity of the product is also visible in the available tools provided by the product itself, for both monitoring of resources and alerting for availability and thresholds
Read full review
Cons
Discontinued Products
  • Provide more options at lower costs
  • It would be nice to see that expanded out to more distributions. What would be potentially even better though is templates. Some hosts can deploy ready-to-run WordPress/Drupal sites, LAMP instances, ownCloud instances, etc. at the drop of a hat. If Springs could replicate this with their container hosting they’d immediately appeal to a much, much wider audience;
Read full review
Oracle
  • Debugging issues has been difficult sometimes, the documentation is too dense and finding the the root cause for an specific issue takes time.
  • The Oracle WebLogic Server console UI feels old and gives a sense of lack of innovation even though it provides so much functionality.
  • I'm not sure if Oracle WebLogic Server supports more modern frameworks, but it feels more like a Java EE specific, maybe there's an opportunity there to appeal to newer application platforms
Read full review
Usability
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Server has so many features that sometimes it's hard to find the right place to setup things, I think the dated user interface does not help with that either. This has a direct impact when deciding to use it as your application server, you'd need to have the right people and invest the time needed to master it. If you're application justifies it then it will definitely be a great choice in the long run.
Read full review
Performance
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
Read full review
Support Rating
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Discontinued Products
Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS.
Read full review
Oracle
I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like Apache Tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from time to get code into production.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Discontinued Products
  • In the beginning I wasn’t sure what I should set it to for my web server, so I left it. After a while the Average usage area begins showing how much resource the container is demanding and from that more adequate limits can be set.
  • Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS.
Read full review
Oracle
  • WebLogic Application Server definitely had a positive ROI since all the applications are deployed on a single platform and making maintenance extremely cost effective.
  • Since all major cloud vendors support and maintain WebLogic, it gives us an opportunity to explore possibilities to move the organizational infrastructure on to the cloud without too much effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots

GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued Screenshots

Screenshot of Springs are reactive servers which scale automatically to the load. That's why you don't need to pay for unused capacity at all.