GoodAccess vs. Plixer Scrutinizer
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GoodAccess | Score9.2 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | GoodAccess is a cybersecurity platform (SASE/SSE) that empowers medium-sized enterprises to easily implement Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) in their infrastructure, regardless of its complexity or scale. By leveraging a Low-Code/No-Code approach, GoodAccess delivers a hardware-free, rapid deployment solution within hours or days, allowing companies to enhance their security without the need for in-house IT experts. The platform ensures… | $35 per month for 5 users (minimum) |
![]() Plixer Scrutinizer | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | Plixer is a developer of network management software with a focus on network traffic analysis, network security, threat detection and network optimization, headquartered in Kennebunk, Maine. Plixer Scrutinizer collects, analyzes, visualizes, and reports on data from every network conversation and digital transaction to deliver security and network intelligence. | N/A |
| GoodAccess | Plixer Scrutinizer | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GoodAccess | Plixer Scrutinizer | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 26 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
96% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 26 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 26 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| GoodAccess | Plixer Scrutinizer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zero Trust Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GoodAccess | Plixer Scrutinizer | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA) Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Forescout Vistaro Platform Score6.7 out of 10 | SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA) Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| GoodAccess | Plixer Scrutinizer | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 7.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | 7.0 |
| GoodAccess | Plixer Scrutinizer | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| ![]()
|
| Pros |
| ![]()
|
| Cons |
| ![]()
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| ![]()
|
| Alternatives Considered |
| ![]()
|
| Return on Investment |
| ![]()
|
| ScreenShots | GoodAccess Screenshots |










