Google ARCore vs. Azure Remote Rendering

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ARCore
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Google's ARCore is an augmented reality development SDK.N/A
Azure Remote Rendering
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure Remote Rendering brings 3D content and interactive experiences to mixed reality devices, such as HoloLens 2. This service uses the computing power of Azure to render even the most complex models in the cloud and streams them in real time to your devices, so users can interact and collaborate with 3D content in detail.
$0.75
per asset (100 transactions free per month)
Pricing
Google ARCoreAzure Remote Rendering
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Asset Conversion
$0.75
per asset (100 transactions free per month)
Standard Remote Rendering
$4.60
per hour
Premium Remote Rendering
$24
per hour
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ARCoreAzure Remote Rendering
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google ARCoreAzure Remote Rendering
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

User Ratings
Google ARCoreAzure Remote Rendering
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google ARCoreAzure Remote Rendering
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
ARCore is well suited for demonstrating 3D objects on surfaces that could be used mostly in product sales, real estate. It can be used to measure objects or a room to make a 3D architectural model out of it, although it's not 100% accurate it can give a pretty good idea. It can be used for games and marketing reasons ARCore is less appropriate for human body tracking, occlusion, and large-scale augmentation where there needs to be a large-scale scanning.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Pros
Google
  • Auto plane identification
  • Light and shadow detection
  • Anchoring things in augmented reality
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cons
Google
  • It supports less android devices which is major problem.
  • Sometimes it takes time for plane or surface detection.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google
Vuforia Engine has limited functionalities compared to ARCore. It has image-based detection and augmentation which requires users to have the anchor image with them for the augmentation to properly occur. ARCore solves that and it's one step less to reach the user and really convince them to try it.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Google
  • It has helped improve our client conversion rate
  • Increased customer satisfaction and winning customers from competition
  • Decreases TAT from consideration to ordering
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots