Google Cloud Datastore vs. Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Datastore
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Datastore is a NoSQL "schemaless" database as a service, supporting diverse data types. The database is managed; Google manages sharding and replication and prices according to storage and activity.N/A
Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle offers the Autonomous Transaction Processing, supporting database self-repair and maintenance with machine learning to eliminate human labor, human error, and manual tuning.
$1.34
OCPU Per Hour
Pricing
Google Cloud DatastoreOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Transaction Processing
$1.34
OCPU Per Hour
Exadata Storage
$118.40
Per Terabyte Per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud DatastoreOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud DatastoreOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Google Cloud DatastoreOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Datastore
10.0
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
-
Ratings
Performance10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Concurrency10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Security10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud DatastoreOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
SingleStore
SingleStore
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
SingleStore
SingleStore
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
SingleStore
SingleStore
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud DatastoreOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(2 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud DatastoreOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
If you want a serverless NoSQL database, no matter it is for personal use, or for company use, Google Cloud Datastore should be on top of your list, especially if you are using Google Cloud as your primary cloud platform. It integrates with all services in the Google Cloud platform.
Read full review
Oracle
If your company's value is not increased by maintaining databases, you should use the ATP.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Automatically handles shards and replication.
  • Schema-less & NoSQL.
  • Fully managed.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Quick and simple to deploy (less than 5 steps to create a new instance)
  • No administrative tasks (backup, re-sizing) required
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • It is hosted on GCP, which makes it harder if your company have multi-cloud strategy.
  • When you want to migrate to other cloud providers, there can be a caveat.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Connectivity between ATP and Oracle Kuberentes Engine cluster seems to drop randomly
  • The ATP could come in an even smaller shape as the smallest shape is already quite big . But if must be more than always free, as that version does have connectivity limitations about 20 connections
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
For the amount of use we're getting from Google Cloud Datastore, switching to any other platform would have more cost with little gain. Not having to manage and maintain Google Cloud Datastore for over 4 years has allowed our teams to work on other things. The price is so low that almost any other option for our needs would be far more expensive in time and money.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Usability
Google
No answers on this topic
Oracle
You get almost all the features of Oracle Database, including the ability to deploy APEX applications, without having to worry about system, storage or database configuration and maintenance, backups, etc. Also, you can start for free and move up adding resources as you need.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
We selected Google Cloud Datastore as one of our candidates for our NoSQL data is because it is provided by Google Cloud, which fits our needs. Most of our infrastructure is on Google Cloud, so when we think about the NoSQL database, the first thing we thought about is Google Cloud Datastore. And it proves itself.
Read full review
Oracle
Both Azure SQL Database and Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing offer a powerful and robust database platform. The advantage of Autonomous Transaction Processing is the ability to host APEX applications for free and without any special/complicated deployment or configuration process. Having a rapid development environment embedded for free was the main advantage for choosing Oracle as my cloud database provider.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Simple billing part of Google Cloud Platform
  • No time spent configuring and maintaining Google Cloud Datastore.
  • Very good uptime for our applications.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Approx 100 times faster spin up than manual setup of an Oracle DB
  • 3h annual maintenance for big version releases (18c to 19c) compared to est. 500h annual maintenance with manual database updates
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing Screenshots

Screenshot of Autonomous Transaction Processing Database takes automatic backupsScreenshot of Provisioning a new Autonomous Transaction Processing is simpleScreenshot of Autonomous Transaction Processing Database  ConsoleScreenshot of Auto scaling and manual scaling options of the database