Google Cloud Datastore vs. Scylla

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Datastore
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Datastore is a NoSQL "schemaless" database as a service, supporting diverse data types. The database is managed; Google manages sharding and replication and prices according to storage and activity.N/A
Scylla
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ScyllaDB headquartered in Palo Alto offers Scylla, a NoSQL database alternative to Apache Cassandra available in Enterprise and Cloud DBaaS editions.N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Datastore
10.0
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Scylla
8.4
1 Ratings
4% below category average
Performance10.02 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Availability10.02 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Concurrency10.02 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Security10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility10.02 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(2 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
If you want a serverless NoSQL database, no matter it is for personal use, or for company use, Google Cloud Datastore should be on top of your list, especially if you are using Google Cloud as your primary cloud platform. It integrates with all services in the Google Cloud platform.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
Scylla is well suited for high-throughput scenarios where keyed data must be read or written with consistently low latency. It's less appropriate for use cases requiring relational queries, secondary indexes, or more structured data sets.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Automatically handles shards and replication.
  • Schema-less & NoSQL.
  • Fully managed.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
  • Low-latency reads
  • CQL has a familiar syntax
  • Parity with Cassandra
  • Practical features
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • It is hosted on GCP, which makes it harder if your company have multi-cloud strategy.
  • When you want to migrate to other cloud providers, there can be a caveat.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
  • Better documentation for best practices (e.g., how to effectively use connection pooling)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
For the amount of use we're getting from Google Cloud Datastore, switching to any other platform would have more cost with little gain. Not having to manage and maintain Google Cloud Datastore for over 4 years has allowed our teams to work on other things. The price is so low that almost any other option for our needs would be far more expensive in time and money.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
No answers on this topic
Usability
Google
No answers on this topic
ScyllaDB
Very easy-to-understand syntax--uses CQL (same as Cassandra), which has many similarities to standard SQL. There are some gotchas, however, that must be known during schema development.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
ScyllaDB
The Scylla cloud support team is incredibly responsive and proactive.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
We selected Google Cloud Datastore as one of our candidates for our NoSQL data is because it is provided by Google Cloud, which fits our needs. Most of our infrastructure is on Google Cloud, so when we think about the NoSQL database, the first thing we thought about is Google Cloud Datastore. And it proves itself.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
Scylla has a quick learning curve (same as Cassandra) compared to other proprietary solutions like BigTable. It supports higher throughput and lower latency that other NoSQL databases like MongoDB, which sacrifice those features for more flexibility and unique features.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Simple billing part of Google Cloud Platform
  • No time spent configuring and maintaining Google Cloud Datastore.
  • Very good uptime for our applications.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
  • Addresses latency requirements of our platform
Read full review
ScreenShots