TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Google Cloud Datastore vs. Titan Distributed Graph Database

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Cloud Datastore

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud Datastore is a NoSQL "schemaless" database as a service, supporting diverse data types. The database is managed; Google manages sharding and replication and prices according to storage and activity.N/A

    Titan

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ATitan is an open-source distributed graph database developed by Aurelius. Aurelius is now part of Datastax (since February 2015).N/A
    Pricing
    Google Cloud DatastoreTitan
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Cloud DatastoreTitan
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Google Cloud DatastoreTitan
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Google Cloud Datastore and Titan Distributed Graph Database
    Feature
    Google Cloud Datastore
    8.4
    3 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Titan Distributed Graph Database
    -
    Ratings
    Performance10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Concurrency9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data model flexibility4.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility9.92 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Google Cloud DatastoreTitan
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Neo4j
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Neo4j
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Neo4j
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google Cloud DatastoreTitan
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Cloud DatastoreTitan
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    I feel like Google Cloud Datastore is well suited when the data models are simple and the possible filtering and sorting operation are not complex. With more complex filtering, the amount of required indexes increase, and so does the costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Titan is definitely a good choice, but it has its learning curve. The documentation may lack in places, and you might have to muster answers from different sources and technologies. But at its core, it does the job of storing and querying graph databases really well. Remember that titan itself is not the whole component, but utilizes other technologies like cassandra, gremlin, tinkerpop, etc to do many other things, and each of them has a learning curve. I would recommend titan for a team, but not for a single person. For single developer, go with Neo4j.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • It is hosted in GCP, our primary cloud provider.
    • It integrates with all the services we use in GCP.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Titan is really good for abstraction of underlying infrastructure. You can choose between different storage engine of your choice.
    • Open source, backed by community, and free.
    • Supports tinkerpop stack which is backed by apache.
    • Uses gremlin for query language making the whole query structure standardized and open for extension if another graph database comes along in future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Part of the Google Cloud Platform walled garden.
    • Pay for read/writes to the datastore, in addition to storage.
    • Not many libraries exist.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • The community is lacking deep documentation. I had to spend many nights trying to figure many things on my own. As graph databases will grow popular, I am sure this will be improved.
    • Not enough community support. Even in SO you might not find many questions. Though there are some users in SO who quickly answer graph database questions. Need more support.
    • Would love an official docker image.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    I give Google Cloud a full score because it satisfies our needs so well. We host most of our infrastructure on Google Cloud and using Google Cloud Datastore helps us to solve our NoSQL storage problem. and Google Cloud Datastore is so scalable and elastic. It saves us lots of time to maintain and saves us money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Google
    The simple implementation, together with the Google Cloud dashboard that allows data inspection, editing and querying, makes Google Cloud Datastore a comprehensive choice when it comes to NoSQL databases.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    If deploying an application in Google Cloud Platform, using Google Cloud Datastore is a no brainer because of the simplicity of setup. Other options would require more setup and configuration, and do not come with the same level of guaranteed uptime as Google Cloud Datastore. In our case, we've been using Google Cloud Datastore for 4 years without any issues and have never had to think about it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    To be honest, titan is not as popular as Neo4j, though they do the same thing. In my personal opinion, titan has lot of potential, but Neo4j is easier to use. If the organization is big enough, it might choose titan because of its open source nature, and high scalability, but Neo4j comes with a lot of enterprise and community support, better query, better documentation, better instructions, and is also backed by leading tech companies. But titan is very strong when you consider standards. Titan follows gremlin and tinkerpop, both of which will be huge in future as more graph database vendors join the market. If things go really well, maybe Neo4j might have to support gremlin as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • It solves our NoSQL database problem.
    • It it highly scalable and available to meets our needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Steep learning curve. Your engineers would have to spend lots of time learning different components before they feel comfortable.
    • Have to plan ahead. Maybe this is the nature of graph databases, but I found it difficult to change my schemas after I had data in production.
    • It is free, so time is the only resource you have to put in titan.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots