Google Compute Engine vs. Wasabi Object Storage
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Compute Engine | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Google Compute Engine is an infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) product from Google Cloud. It provides virtual machines with carbon-neutral infrastructure which run on the same data centers that Google itself uses. | $0 per month GB |
Wasabi Object Storage | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Wasabi Technologies headquartered in Boston offers "hot cloud storage," object storage available pay-as-you-go as well as reserved capacity storage which they describe as tier free, and easily manageable. Additionally, Wasabi offers a Cloud NAS option, designed to be "hands free" and require minimal effort from administrators while having no impact on users and applications. | $5.99 per month per TB |
| Google Compute Engine | Wasabi Object Storage | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Prices vary according to region (i.e US central, east, & west time zones). Google Compute Engine also offers a discounted rate for a 1 & 3 year commitment. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Compute Engine | Wasabi Object Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 45 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 44 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 44 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
91% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 31 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
93% Implementation went as expected 41 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Google Compute Engine | Wasabi Object Storage | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Google Compute Engine | Wasabi Object Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 | ![]() Azure Blob Storage Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 | Everpure FlashBlade Score9.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 | Google Cloud Storage Score9.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Google Compute Engine | Wasabi Object Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 6.9 | - |
| Usability | 8.0 | - |
| Availability | 9.6 | - |
| Performance | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 7.3 | - |
| Google Compute Engine | Wasabi Object Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Google Compute Engine Screenshots |








