Flutter by Google vs. Spark AR Studio

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Flutter
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Flutter is an open-source mobile application development framework created by Google. It is used to develop applications for Android and iOS, as well as being the primary method of creating applications for Google Fuchsia.
$0
Spark AR Studio
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Spark AR Studio is an augmented reality SDK, from Facebook.N/A
Pricing
Flutter by GoogleSpark AR Studio
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FlutterSpark AR Studio
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Flutter by GoogleSpark AR Studio
Considered Both Products
Flutter
Chose Flutter by Google
I have used Flutter for cross-platform applications which are unique in the tech industry, I like the user interface created with Flutter.
Spark AR Studio

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Flutter by GoogleSpark AR Studio
Small Businesses
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Flutter by GoogleSpark AR Studio
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(17 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Flutter by GoogleSpark AR Studio
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Flutter is well known for native app development, if you have android studio installed on your system, you can quickly start using it. This might not be the best choice for you if you do not wish to learn a new language, i.e. Dart and you do not know it already.
Read full review
Meta Platforms Inc
Spark AR Studio is used to create AR experiences for the Brand Partners. The AR experience is created so interactive that the user is attracted to use the filter many times
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • User interface design works great across all platforms, including native styling for iOS/macOS.
  • Native compilation for mobile platforms and a decent rendering engine results in slick apps that can make the most of your device.
  • Dart is a well thought out language and easy to pick up.
  • Makes cross-platform development of good looking GUI apps a doddle.
Read full review
Meta Platforms Inc
  • Creating AR filters in a short duration of Time.
  • AR concept bridges the Gap between user and the products.
  • It is simplest tool to get started with the career of AR Creator.
  • It has a rich & numerous support of assets in Spark AR Library.
  • It is easy to launch the effect on our Social Media Platform.
  • It is an Open-Source platform. One needs to login with Facebook and can get started to it.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Occasionally updates to the Flutter SDK result in wide-sweeping changes that seem to not be thoroughly tested and considered. Flutter sometimes evolves too fast for its own good.
  • While the 3rd-party Flutter package ecosystem is vast and rich, 1st-party support for basic things (audio/video playback, battery information, Bluetooth services, etc.) are lacking. You are occasionally forced to rely on an open-source package for use-cases that other platforms have native support for.
  • Documentation, particularly around testing, is lacking. While there are some great docs, like the Dart Style Guide, many Flutter-focused support documents are lacking in quality and real-world usability.
  • Flutter allows you to architect an app however you want. While this is a great feature, it also adds complexity and leads to the current state of Flutter's state management, where there are 50+ options on how to organize your app, with very little official guidance or recommendations from the Flutter team. For a beginner, this can create decision paralysis.
Read full review
Meta Platforms Inc
  • It requires high computation power to run this software.
  • It is having a frequent updates within a months.
  • The AR experience created in Spark AR is only supported in Instagram & Facebook.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
I have experience with react and React Native. I would say that the idea behind all those frameworks are quite similar. However, I found the javascript-based frameworks a bit more accessible as you could utilise your javascript knowledge. Here, Flutter works with its own language. This has advantages and disadvantages sometimes. I found the community around javascript frameworks bigger and therefore sometimes more helpful. However, Flutter does a good job here as well. I think the main argument for Flutter is its usability for less experienced developers. If you do not have knowledge in javascript or other programming languages then I think it is much easier to start with Flutter than with another framework like react. I think the package that you get form scratch is better than in the other frameworks were you have to set up and learn a lot more before you can start.
Read full review
Meta Platforms Inc
I have used Spark AR Studio for the first time to create AR experiences and it deeply satisfies me. I have never used other software similar to this. It is most simple and creative software which I have ever found till now.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • The rapid development capabilities of Flutter allow us to build apps we could not have previously considered commercially viable, opening new revenue streams.
  • Free and open licensing made adoption very easy (ie. free/low cost!).
  • In comparison to Qt, our time spent arguing with build tools and perfecting development environments has decreased substantially.
Read full review
Meta Platforms Inc
  • Open-source platform to create immersive AR experience.
  • Creates a better reach on our social media platform.
  • Easy & creative tool to get start as AR creator.
Read full review
ScreenShots