TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Security Operations

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AChronicle is a cloud-native SecOps platform used to proactively uncover the latest threats in near real-time, and enable security teams to detect, investigate and respond with speed and precision. It is based on the former Siemplify.N/A

    IBM Security QRadar SIEM

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AIBM Security QRadar is security information and event management (SIEM) Software.N/A
    Pricing
    Google Security OperationsIBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Security OperationsIBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Google Security OperationsIBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
    IBM Qradar takes the best from its competitors. Reliable and stable but sometimes very expensive, the SIEM from IBM offers a wide range of scenarios in which the customers can suite and size their own infrastructures. IBM Qradar doesn't really needs to stack up againt its …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Would buy again
    67 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    61 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    70 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    38 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Implementation went as expected
    59 Answers
    Features
    Google Security OperationsIBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Google Security Operations and IBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Feature
    Google Security Operations
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Security QRadar SIEM
    8.5
    69 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings9.927 Ratings
    Correlation00 Ratings8.669 Ratings
    Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings9.527 Ratings
    Deployment flexibility00 Ratings7.827 Ratings
    Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings8.965 Ratings
    Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings7.569 Ratings
    Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings9.725 Ratings
    Data integration/API management00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings7.648 Ratings
    Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings8.049 Ratings
    Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings7.75 Ratings
    Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings7.947 Ratings
    Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings8.97 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Google Security OperationsIBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Splunk SOAR
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Sumo Logic
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Score1.1 out of 10
    SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM)
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google Security OperationsIBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.6
    (89 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.1
    (62 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.1
    (58 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Security OperationsIBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    If you have lots of log sources across different solutions. Then UDM co-relation is a game changer and well suited for you. IF you close and document all the incident report in SIEM then it's not good for you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    I would only recommend IBM Security QRadar SIEM in a few situations. For one, it's very easy to setup and use if all your log sources are generic from known vendors. It's also significantly cheaper than Splunk, which is nice if you're trying to save money or be more efficient. I would not recommend IBM Security QRadar SIEM for environments with a lot of custom logs and complicated detection requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • automation of repetitive processes
    • customized playbooks.
    • The alert triage quality.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Enables identification and prioritization of vulnerabilities in IT infrastructure for corrective action.
    • Facilitates security incident investigation and forensic analysis.
    • Provides a real-time view of security events, enabling immediate incident response.
    • Can integrate with external threat intelligence sources to enrich data and improve threat detection.
    • Enables the generation of detailed and customized reports.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Connector improvement
    • UX experience
    • Reporting
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Need to spend more time configuring the system to properly interpret and normalize different type of data collected from multiple resources.
    • While Rule creation QRadar uses that rules to detect security threats and generate alerts, but to creating and managing rules is bit complex & tedious work to complete.
    • IBM Security QRadar SIEM is excellent in handling large & complex systems that requires in-depth knowledge and extensive training to configure and maintain the system which includes upgrading, optimization of performance & issue troubleshooting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    QRadar is an established and stable product, we have been using it for many years and want to continue to focus on it. Anyone who has used the product and knows it knows how reliable it is and how it facilitates continuous monitoring of threats from outside and inside. it is an exceptional product that is very useful for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    Google Security Operation is quite good replacement of the old product. We really like it, it new product and doesn't have much soar capabilities like other solution like it doesn't provide a market place to just install new plugins. Overall it's a great replacement than the other SIEM.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    As a grade I give 8 as QRadar is not easy to learn. It requires some time to master it. It also needs a team of people actively working on the product. Once you learn to use it the software works very well and it is easy to correlate and understand detected threats. It only takes time to learn how to use it well and configure it properly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Customer support is Good of IBM, While Using IBM QRadar its deployment is to slow and suddenly stop working and crashed we have contacted IBM Support and Rised a Ticket within a few minute we get call back from customer support and Query Resolved by them Fast And Rapid Support of Ibm
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The training was very useful and the people who taught us were very knowledgeable. Although the software may initially seem difficult to learn they made things much easier for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The training was very useful and the people who taught us were very knowledgeable. Although the software may initially seem difficult to learn they made things much easier for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Initial patience is required to learn how to use the product, and it takes a dedicated team to use it. One person is not enough, and it's not enough to just set it up and check it once in a while. It has to be used daily and kept under control to be used effectively
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    IBM Qradar takes the best from its competitors. Reliable and stable but sometimes very expensive, the SIEM from IBM offers a wide range of scenarios in which the customers can suite and size their own infrastructures. IBM Qradar doesn't really needs to stack up againt its competitors because it already sets an example in the SIEM world.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • automates repetitive tasks increasing output
    • has reduced unnecessary workload on our analysts.
    • Its high security intelligence has minimized time for remediation o security breaches.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Offense investigation was really helped in tackling the incidents. It was accurate and brief
    • The automation with IBM resilient (SOAR) was a milestone in elimination of user mistakes
    • The X-Force threat intelligence supported us in getting the work done without any 3rd party enterprise OSINT database
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Google Security Operations Screenshots

    Screenshot of MarketplaceScreenshot of Case ManagementScreenshot of Interactive InvestigationScreenshot of Incident ManagementScreenshot of Incident Response PlaybooksScreenshot of Interactive Dashboards

    IBM Security QRadar SIEM Screenshots

    Screenshot of QRadar SIEM Cloud native- Threat intelligence preview