GreenGeeks vs. Hostinger

If you are looking for a shared hosting service, Green Geeks pricing is comparable to most vendors. T2 tech support is generally knowledgeable, T1 is responsive via chat, but often is not able to resolve issues (other than KB questions). Load balancing on a shared server is difficult for all vendors, since individual website usage is hard to predict. Vendors have different ways of dealing with this - some simply do not guarantee resource limits (e.g. available memory, PHP threads, etc). Green Geeks does provide resource limits as part of their contracts, but they frequently downgrade those limits, presumably to address overloaded servers. BUT BE AWARE - I believe GreenGeeks uses unethical practices when a customer wants to cancel. It is my personal experience that they make it extremely difficult / impossible to cancel a contract. I feel the process is not transparent and they will ignore emails directing them to cancel. In my experience, they will then proceed to charge customers for a renewed contract. I believe multiple customers have reported this problem.

Hostinger web hosting is the perfect fit for beginners, bloggers, startups, and small businesses. Because it includes all the essentials they need to power, build and manage their beautiful websites.You get faster lightning speed, robust security, and top-notch customer support at the lowest possible cost. Not only that, Hostinger offers 99.9% uptime which is the industry standard, so that may your website will experience a little downtime.

• T1 support generally responds w/i 15-30 minutes

• It has affordable hosting with good uptime.
• Hostinger provides a separate webmail log-in option, so no one can access it directly from hpanel.

• In my personal experience, the billing department uses unethical practices when customers cancel subs.

• Website builder
• Payment gateway
• SSL certificate
• Extra storage
• Inconsistent website speed
• Some tools are bit harder to use when compared to its alternatives

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

From a technical perspective, all shared server vendors are comparable. Bluehost has terrible customer support. A2 is more expensive, but has more personalized support.

As compared to the competitor, it provides hosting plans at affordable rates with slightly fewer features that can be neglected.

• Throttling servers impacted website availability.

• Overall it improved our ROI, as they provied affordable hosting for multiple websites

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info