An open-source end-to-end GenAI platform for air-gapped, on-premises or cloud VPC deployments. Users can Query and summarize documents or just chat with local private GPT LLMs using h2oGPT, an Apache V2 open-source project. And the commercially available Enterprise h2oGPTe provides information retrieval on internal data, privately hosts LLMs, and secures data.
N/A
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Score8.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft R Open and Revolution R Enterprise are big data R distribution for servers, Hadoop clusters, and data warehouses. Microsoft acquired original developer Revolution Analytics in 2016.
Microsoft R is available in two editions: Microsoft R Open (formerly Revolution R Open) and Revolution R Enterprise.
N/A
Pricing
H2O.ai
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
H2O.ai
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
H2O.ai
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of H2O.ai and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Feature
H2O.ai
-
Ratings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
5.3
3 Ratings
45% below category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources
00 Ratings
6.13 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
MDM Integration
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of H2O.ai and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Feature
H2O.ai
-
Ratings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
7.0
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Visualization
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of H2O.ai and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Feature
H2O.ai
-
Ratings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
4.8
3 Ratings
52% below category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment
00 Ratings
5.13 Ratings
Data Transformations
00 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Data Encryption
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Built-in Processors
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of H2O.ai and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Feature
H2O.ai
-
Ratings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
6.0
3 Ratings
34% below category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools
00 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning
00 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of H2O.ai and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Most suited if in little time you wanted to build and train a model. Then, H2O makes life very simple. It has support with R, Python and Java, so no programming dependency is required to use it. It's very simple to use. If you want to modify or tweak your ML algorithm then H2O is not suitable. You can't develop a model from scratch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you are a MS shop specifically, or have more generic data requirement needs from Microsoft sourced data this will work well. If you have a lot of disparate data across a number of unique platforms/cloud systems/3rd party hosted data warehouses then this product will have issues or a lack of documentation on the net. Performance-wise this product is equal to other R platforms out there.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
In general, Revolution Analytics brings a lot of value to the organization. The renewal decision would be based on return on investment in terms of quantified actionable insights that are getting generated against the cost of the product. Additionally, market brand of the tool and reputation risk in terms of possible acquisition and its impact to overall organizational analytic strategy would be considered as well.
It is good, easy to use, improvements are being made to the product and more info being shared in the community. It just needs some more time to become more integrated to other platforms and tools/data out there.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Generally support comes through the forums and user generated channels which are helpful, easy to access, quickly turned around and provided by knowledgeable users. However the support channels are not employees and the channels are often used as a way to learn quick difficult elements of R. Better design, users interface and tutorial options would alleviate the need for this sort of interaction.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Both are open source (though H2O only up to some level). Both comprise of deep learning, but H2O is not focused directly on deep learning, while Tensor Flow has a "laser" focus on deep learning. H2O is also more focused on scalability. H2O should be looked at not as a competitor but rather a complementary tool. The use case is usually not only about the algorithms, but also about the data model and data logistics and accessibility. H2O is more accessible due to its UI. Also, both can be accessed from Python. The community around TensorFlow seems larger than that of H2O.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The two are different products for different purposes. But for someone who has little or no experience in R programming, Power BI would be better for starting with. Having said that, Microsoft R is built on R, thus allowing for customization of complex calculations not typically available otherwise.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Positive impact: saving in infrastructure expenses - compared to other bulky tools this costs a fraction
Positive impact: ability to get quick fixes from H2O when problems arise - compared to waiting for several months/years for new releases from other vendors
Positive impact: Access to H2O core team and able to get features that are needed for our business quickly added to the core H2O product
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info