H2O.ai vs. Minitab Statistical Software

Most suited if in little time you wanted to build and train a model. Then, H2O makes life very simple. It has support with R, Python and Java, so no programming dependency is required to use it. It's very simple to use. If you want to modify or tweak your ML algorithm then H2O is not suitable. You can't develop a model from scratch.

Incentivized

Minitab Statistical Software is used from development batches to commercial batches to identify that process is in state of control through various charts and graphs. we can optimised our process by continuous monitoring of product trends. its is less suited where large number of data need to handle and evaluate..

Incentivized

• Excellent analytical and prediction tool
• In the beginning, usage of H20 Flow in Web UI enables quick development and sharing of the analytical model
• Readily available algorithms, easy to use in your analytical projects
• Faster than Python scikit learn (in machine learning supervised learning area)
• It can be accessed (run) from Python, not only JAVA etc.
• Well documented and suitable for fast training or self studying
• In the beginning, one can use the clickable Flow interface (WEB UI) and later move to a Python console. There is then no need to click in H20 Flow
• It can be used as open source

Incentivized

• Life cycle product verification and control
• Cpk value calculation and control
• Historical data evaluation and decision making based on that data.

Incentivized

• Better documentation
• Improve the Visual presentations including charting etc

Incentivized

• This to be make financially affordable
• Direct feeding of data provision need to provided
• It must be update to handle large data.

Incentivized

I would give 10 out of 10 rating due to its functionality and easy to use interface. Its included wide range of tools like graph, chart, time study graph. There is predefined inbuilt templet available for easy to use and understand process well. there is availability of vast training materials enhances our experience.

Incentivized

The overall experience I have with H2O is really awesome, even with its cost effectiveness.

Incentivized

Both are open source (though H2O only up to some level). Both comprise of deep learning, but H2O is not focused directly on deep learning, while Tensor Flow has a "laser" focus on deep learning. H2O is also more focused on scalability. H2O should be looked at not as a competitor but rather a complementary tool. The use case is usually not only about the algorithms, but also about the data model and data logistics and accessibility. H2O is more accessible due to its UI. Also, both can be accessed from Python. The community around TensorFlow seems larger than that of H2O.

Incentivized

• Positive impact: saving in infrastructure expenses - compared to other bulky tools this costs a fraction
• Positive impact: ability to get quick fixes from H2O when problems arise - compared to waiting for several months/years for new releases from other vendors
• Positive impact: Access to H2O core team and able to get features that are needed for our business quickly added to the core H2O product

Incentivized

• We could control our process and its continuous monitoring that reduce process failure chances.
• It helpful in database decision making process like rejection or acceptance of batch.
• Process is improved and productivity increased.

Incentivized