TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

HAProxy Community Edition vs. Oracle GlassFish Server

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    HAProxy Community Edition

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AHAProxy Community Edition is a free, open source reverse-proxy offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications. It is presented as suited for very high traffic web sites.

    $0

    Oracle GlassFish Server

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOracle GlassFish Server was originally developed by Sun Microsystems and is available open source or supported by Oracle. It is an application server.N/A
    Pricing
    HAProxy Community EditionOracle GlassFish Server
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HAProxy Community EditionOracle GlassFish Server
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    HAProxy Community EditionOracle GlassFish Server
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of HAProxy Community Edition and Oracle GlassFish Server
    Feature
    HAProxy Community Edition
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle GlassFish Server
    8.8
    3 Ratings
    10% above category average
    IDE support00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Security management00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Administration and management00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
    Application server performance00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Installation00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    HAProxy Community EditionOracle GlassFish Server
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    NGINX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    F5 BIG-IP
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Oracle WebLogic Server
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    F5 BIG-IP
    Score9.2 out of 10
    NGINX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HAProxy Community EditionOracle GlassFish Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.7
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HAProxy Community EditionOracle GlassFish Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    It prevents a single server failure from being a downtime event by adding redundancy to every layer of your architecture. A load balancer facilitates redundancy for the backend layer (web/app servers), but for a true high availability setup, you need to have redundant load balancers as well. So it is well suited for all production related servers and less suited for individual servers that do not require redundancy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Glassfish is well suited for large-scale cluster deployments and integrates well with F5 load balancers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Low-Cost Load Balancer
    • Intelligent Request Routing based on URL and/or URI
    • Extremely flexible load balancing and healthchecks, can do almost anything including HTTP, HTTPS, PostgreSQL, etc.
    • SSL Termination
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • The product offers Java EE support.
    • As the version supported by Oracle we have an extensive documentation, the Oracle GlassFish server online documentation library, patches ,and support from the supplier.
    • Ease of use through the administration console.
    • Integration with the NetBeans development interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • A few, rare times each year, HAProxy CPU utilization spikes to 100% and server has to be rebooted - this may be related to HAProxy OR it could be an external factor causing this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • One of the areas where we found Glassfish adaptation difficult for our company was the lack of documentation and community forums covering important issues.
    • We ran into a roadblock with OAuth 2.0 implementation and did not get great support on that issue.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Open Source
    It is very easy to use. I was able to find a lot of documents for it on the internet. Very good community support. There are lots of examples available to try. We mostly use a command-line user interface to interact with it. The CLI is also super easy to use and very easy to interact with
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Open Source
    We haven't used customer support. We mostly used the community version. We build a multi-node HAProxy cluster with HA to the proxy itself using opensource plugins available. With the support available on the internet and the documents available we don't need to use much customer support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    We chose HA Proxy because it is cheaper than a hardware balancer, it is an open-source solution with a large community behind it and with constant updates. It also allows custom scripts according to needs.HA Proxy is a solution used in many internet sites like GitHub, Reddit, Twitter, and Tuenti.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    At the time we did a small proof of concept with both platforms and Oracle Glassfish had more intuitive administration and configuration functions
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • Significantly lower investment vs competitors. In the case of F5s we have Virtual Editions so we're paying for the hardware to run it on top of the several thousand dollar licenses that are required for each pair and we currently have a pair of F5s per client so there's a huge potential for cost savings there.
    • Requires our network engineers to learn a new skill or our Systems engineers to take on the responsibility of managing the load balancers. It's not a huge difference either way, but it does impact the way we have done business in the past.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Glassfish which initially spun off from an Open Source project has a community edition which is free to use and offers great ROI.
    • In comparison to cloud offerings like AWS and Google App Engine, Glassfish requires more cost upfront for installation and management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots