Harness vs. Tricentis qTest
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Harness | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Harness, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is a Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform designed to provide a simple, safe and secure way for engineering and DevOps teams to release applications into production. Founded in 2016, Harness uses machine learning to detect the quality of deployments and automatically roll back failed ones, saving time and reducing the need for custom scripting and manual oversight. | N/A |
Tricentis qTest | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018. | $1,200 per year per user |
| Harness | Tricentis qTest | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Harness | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 78% Would buy again 31 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 84% Delivers good value for the price 26 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Happy with the feature set 37 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 78% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 90% Implementation went as expected 27 Answers | |
| Harness | Tricentis qTest | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Harness | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.0 |
| Usability | - | 7.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 1.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 5.0 |
| Harness | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Harness Screenshots | Tricentis qTest Screenshots |









