TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

HashiCorp Packer vs. TrueSight Automation for Servers

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    HashiCorp Packer

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AHashiCorp Packer automates the creation of machine images, coming out of the box with support to build images for Amazon EC2, CloudStack, DigitalOcean, Docker, Google Compute Engine, Microsoft Azure, QEMU, VirtualBox, and VMware.N/A

    TrueSight Automation for Servers

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/ABMC's TrueSight Automation for Servers (formerly under the BladeLogic Automation Suite) is a server lifecycle automation application supporting configuration, patching and maintaining physical, cloud and virtual servers.N/A
    Pricing
    HashiCorp PackerTrueSight Automation for Servers
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HashiCorp PackerTrueSight Automation for Servers
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    HashiCorp PackerTrueSight Automation for Servers
    Small Businesses
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Salt
    Score6.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Perforce Puppet
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    Salt
    Score6.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HashiCorp PackerTrueSight Automation for Servers
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HashiCorp PackerTrueSight Automation for Servers
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    We use packer to generate new machine images for multiple platforms on every change to our Configuration Management tools like Chef/Puppet/Ansible It's act single tool for Image building for Multi-provider like AWS/Azure/GCP Helps to achieve Dev/Prod Parity Packer itself doesn't have a state like Terraform. You can't do packer output AMI ID. If you have a scenario where you want to maintain the state for images it would be tough to manage via Packer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    It would be very good to backup multiple platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Multi-provider portability
    • Greater testability
    • Super fast infrastructure deployment
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    • The backup process is simple and easy to learn and change.
    • It has the ability to manage multiple platforms.
    • It also can push configures to multiple devices at once.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Manageability
    • Manageability
    • Manageability
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    • It would easier for users if there are more report templates.
    • The dashboard can be improved as well.
    • Otherwise, I am pretty happy with the tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    We are happy with the use of Packer in our organization. Apart from manageability, I don't find any other drawback with Packer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IBM
    It's best for building Image with many features and benefits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    I only once required support and it was very smooth.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    I haven't found any issue in Implementation that itself describes how well this tool is built.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    There are lot of tools in market which does the job for Image creation but all of them are not complete Machine/Image as a code. All other alternatives can create Image partially. Main reason for selecting Packer are Packer is lightweight, portable, and command-line driven Packer helps keep development, staging, and production as similar as possible. Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image Multi-provider portability is the feature to die for
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Super fast infrastructure deployment
    • Quick turnaround of infrastructure in multiple cloud using single tool.
    • Increase productivity by reducing time in infrastructure building.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    • Make my work more reliable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots