Hitachi Lumada vs. JFrog Connect vs. Watson IoT Platform

Organizations may use sensors like RFID and break beams to automatically monitor components as they travel through the assembly. Real-time data from IoT may help managers and supervisors monitor the performance of their teams. With this level of transparency, bottlenecks can be identified, problems can be pinpointed, and progress can be made more quickly.

Incentivized

For us, it has been well suited for monitoring devices that are placed remotely and have no easy access to. Most of our devices are sent to customers which we have little or no contact with. Rather than the customers finding a problem, reporting it to us and then us investigating it. We can just be notified of the problem and deal with it without the customer realising.

For large companies with large-scale manufacturing, electronics management, and infrastructures that require lots of maintenance, IBM Watson IoT is a must-have. It greatly increases performance, decreases downtime, and is an all-around great management dashboard. This is best for infrastructures that have a larger infrastructures of IoT devices in an enterprise/manufacturing setting, otherwise IBM Watson may not bring many benefits to your team.

Incentivized

• Improve business process outcomes.
• Improve business process agility.
• Drive innovation, cost management, and revenue growth.

Incentivized

• Accelerates remote management for iot devices
• Allows for remote upgrades and fleet management
• Alerts us when devices go offline allowing us to be more proactive with our customers

• The asset information is available in both static and dynamic format (from thermal images, to OEM data, to time series data). The ability to ingest all the information using a single platform has great value.
• Another benefit is a seamless integration with Maximo. This has been a challenge with other 3rd party systems available.
• The experience of IBM Maximo systems updates is positive.

Incentivized

• Data security can be improved.
• Adoption flexibility.
• Steep learning curve.

Incentivized

• Nothing at this stage

• Some of the tutorials could use a little more improvement - While there is a considerable amount of documentation, most of the good documentation for Watson IoT we found to be from third-parties.
• Administration and billing tools could use a bit more improvement - The UI is a bit clunky and poorly-designed here.
• Be prepared to work with IBM support to get this going - Their turn-around support for inquiries can be lengthy, and setup time may also be quite lengthy because of this.

Incentivized

A lot of components are available and able to use what you need. Module library, Advanced analytics. Batch data processing. Variety of ways to integrate. Cost-effective. These are some of the ways Hitachi Lumada ranks above the ones we have used.

Incentivized

I haven't really found any other product or service which does the same as UpSwift, therefore I have not needed to look for alternative products

Predix has recently launched their Asset Performance management Unified system. I am keen to see how it stacks up against Watson.

Incentivized

• Overall cost.
• Financial/organizational viability.
• Strong services expertise.

Incentivized

• Ability to scale our network

• Positive - This tool greatly increases most company's manufacturing and production efficiency, and the use-cases are extensive. It was a great way of decreasing down-time for us.
• Negative - Took lots of work and energy to get up and running, we had to rely on IBM support and tutorials many times during this process.
• Positive - Quite cheap, most of the tiers of pricing cost very little, and it's possible to use Watson IoT for a few months for free to see if it is beneficial for your company.

Incentivized