Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS) vs. Lanamark Suite

It's best suited for financial institutions which are running on Oracle, SAP HANA, Microsoft SQL Server, or mainframe workloads. Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS) fits due to its high availability & low latency performance. Also, the migration is relatively non-disrupting which is very important for financial organizations. It is also proven beneficial for large institutes with mix workloads or large-scale virtualized environments.

Incentivized

• Intergreation of legancy storage solutions
• Single pane for future storage configurations
• Amazing replication capability for disaster recovery purposes

Incentivized

• Better user interface
• Unified storage to fit mid-market needs
• Complex installation process

Incentivized

Except documentations and searching across those documents, everything is easy to follow and use on.

Incentivized

There is definitely no comparison to any of the products when comparing to Hitachi SVOS. I beleieve this is the only unique product which can leverage older storage systems. Dell Avamar can be a great product if you are considering DR replication alone. The DR replication ratio is quite high in Dell avamar. However given that the current bandwidth available outweights this benefit

Incentivized

• Cost had bit of negative impact
• Due to stable OS and live migrations support it has allowed us to dynamically tune the capacity of our test clusters leading to better COGS for our business

Incentivized