Cisco Vulnerability Management vs. Wabbi

Wabbi

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cisco Vulnerability Management	Score 8.3 out of 10	N/A	Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM by Kenna Security, which was acquired by Cisco in June of 2021), is a vulnerability management platform featuring real-time cyber-risk analysis and predictive modeling based on intelligence feeds and global attack telemetries to provide accurate, reliable risk prioritization and protection.	N/A
Wabbi	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Wabbi delivers scalable application security for Enterprise Development teams.	N/A

Pricing

Cisco Vulnerability Management

Wabbi

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cisco Vulnerability Management	Wabbi
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Contact vendor for pricing informaion.

More Pricing Information

Pricing Info

Features

Cisco Vulnerability Management

Wabbi

Threat Intelligence

Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
	Cisco Vulnerability Management 8.6 2 Ratings 5% above category average	Wabbi - Ratings
Network Analytics	7.31 Ratings	00 Ratings
Threat Recognition	10.01 Ratings	00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification	9.22 Ratings	00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting	6.82 Ratings	00 Ratings
Threat Analysis	6.82 Ratings	00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting	10.01 Ratings	00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification	10.01 Ratings	00 Ratings

Vulnerability Management Tools

Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
	Cisco Vulnerability Management 9.2 2 Ratings 10% above category average	Wabbi - Ratings
IT Asset Realization	9.22 Ratings	00 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring	9.22 Ratings	00 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence	9.22 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Cisco Vulnerability Management	Wabbi
Small Businesses	Action1 Score 9.5 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Action1 Score 9.5 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cisco Vulnerability Management	Wabbi
Likelihood to Recommend	8.4 (2 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	10.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cisco Vulnerability Management	Wabbi
Likelihood to Recommend	Cisco It works well when interfacing with Qualys VM QualysGuard to highlight server vulnerabilities, providing details on the affected packages and programs, along with solutions and links to the provider's websites, so our servers can be kept safe by quickly addressing issues. Because vulnerability scores are assigned, we can prioritize which servers to address first. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Wabbi No answers on this topic
Pros	Cisco Vulnerability tracking Risk Meter reporting to pinpoint specific systems or vulnerabilities Provides vulnerability scores to see what is high / medium / low urgency Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Wabbi No answers on this topic
Cons	Cisco The layout of the information could use some improvement. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Wabbi No answers on this topic
Usability	Cisco CVM provides a very easy to understand and use interfaces. Dashboards and reporting are compiled nicely when risk meters are created. After initial setup of software cisco onboarding teams do an amazing job going over all areas of this software to provide best overall usability of the product. Against other tools setup and usability is at a higher standard Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Wabbi No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Cisco We run a flavor of multiple products and CVM enhances/complements those tools by pinpointing where the vulnerabilities are at on our network. Intune and Automox being products CVM works well with when its time to patch affected systems. Tenable we used prior to CVM and its product was too complex and clunky and always had issues with asset duplication. CVM simplified vulnerability scanning and made it a lot easier to manage compared to Tenable Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Wabbi No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Cisco Has kept our company safe from exploits. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Wabbi No answers on this topic
ScreenShots