HPE ConvergedSystem 500 for SAP HANA vs. Infinio

HP ConvergedSystem 500 for SAP HANA is serving us really well in our organisation and maybe, it is very appropriate in hospitals and healthcare organisations. This is because, so far, it serves our current needs perfectly well since its deployment. However, in situations of fluctuating electric power, where power can go off for hours, it just sits and looks at you, like any other automated system anyway.

Incentivized

Infinio is best suited for infrastructure that has high-latency read IO performance challenges. It does nothing to help write IO, so keep in mind the type of workload for which you need to reduce latency. If you have traditional SAS or SATA storage, Infinio has a tremendous impact on the response time of many applications. You can build your cluster's caching pool from either available RAM or an internal drive inside each host. This flexibility helps Infinio to be suitable across many types of environments.

Incentivized

• Architecture includes expansive memory - permits additional memory as to not bog the server.
• Cloud/Server storage is reliable and permits our employees to communicate and access data on the go.
• Client Virtualization allows employee-customer access easily while on site.

Incentivized

• Citrix system boot time and application opening much faster
• SQL database efficiency

Incentivized

• Too many links to click on
• Can get confusing

Incentivized

• The interface needs a way to allow for RBAC so everyone is not an admin.
• Alerts should be configurable whenever a VM or host is not functioning correctly.

Incentivized

Support has always been helpful and responsive. Upgrades can be guided and scheduled so you can be confident that things will go smoothly. The product issues have been minimal and the support team has always done a great job at getting back to me with the recommended fixes that solved my problems.

Incentivized

I didn't really work with that.

Incentivized

Infinio has no real market competition. There was a tool called Pernix FVP that did both read/write acceleration that I evaluated that became end-of-life while it was in POC. It was more complicated to deploy and remove than Infinio and required downtime for each host. Also, the fact that it was no longer supported made the decision to choose Infinio easy.

Incentivized

• Lower Overhead, cut man hour costs.
• Greater Return on Investment
• Data reliability is stronger than ever.

Incentivized

• Positive impact has been delaying large storage refresh purchases.
• Positive impact has been improving read latency without having to add infrastructure.

Incentivized