HPE Synergy vs. IBM PureSystems

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HPE Synergy
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
HPE Synergy is Hewlett Packard Enterprise's software designed to support a composable infrastructure, which treats IT resources as a service that can be "composed" and deployed out to applications in near real-time, eliminating the need to configure hardware.N/A
IBM PureSystems
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
IBM's PureSystems is a converged infrastructure option.N/A
Pricing
HPE SynergyIBM PureSystems
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HPE SynergyIBM PureSystems
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HPE SynergyIBM PureSystems
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

User Ratings
HPE SynergyIBM PureSystems
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
HPE SynergyIBM PureSystems
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Best suited for virtualization and multi-environment implementations. Bare metal deployments have a few more limitations.
Read full review
IBM
I honestly don't see an area where the PureSystem couldn’t fit in and be of a great use due to its ability to integrate a multitude of technology, (some that are outdated even) to create a stable network platform. I think if a corporation is seeking to upgrade their system but is financially disadvantaged they couldn't make a better investment for more bang for the buck than buying the IBM PureSystem.
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Nearly instant configuration of applications according to specific requirements within a single pool
  • Deployment, updating and monitoring via a single interface
  • Updates and redeployment with minimal service interruption
  • Support for virtual, bare metal and containerized workloads
Read full review
IBM
  • Data reliability- by monitoring and increasing load balances PureFlex has made data and applications available more readily across departments.
  • PureFlex- has increased data integrity. By insuring that data is transported with greater fluidity, PureFlex has increased our data integrity by many folds. By helping us to be more precise in our data delivery, our customers have been more satisfied.
  • PureFlex- Integration within and scalability has been seamless. We have not experienced very many issues and the ones we have experienced were readily mitigated with the expert help of IBM technicians.
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Firmware repository size limitations could be larger (was increased recently but still is only room for a few SPPs)
  • Profile template updates flag all machines that haven't had their profile updated from the template, causing the dashboard to go red with warnings and can cause unnecessary concern
  • OneView, while powerful isn't as user friendly as it could be
Read full review
IBM
  • Efficiency- PureSystems has enabled our users to work more efficiently with customer orders, providing the requested data in a far less turn around time than ever before.
  • Scalability- We have already have had to scale up our memory storage due to a successful agreement with a data warehouse and it was a seamless effort completing the project with the assistance of expert IBM technicians at our call when we had any questions.
  • Combinability- PureFlex's ability to pretty much accept any other technology and incorporate it into a single network has saved us a tremondeous amount of money and time to stable platform.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
The hardware has fulfilled all of the promises that it made when we first acquired it. The only thing that would preclude this would be if the organization decided to holistically switch hardware vendors for reasons other than performance and feature sets.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
While all similar offerings can achieve basically the same thing, HPE Synergy stands out against Cisco and Dell offerings with respect to manageability, ease of use and flexibility - HPE Synergy offers configurations groups of chassis to create logical enclosures that can be managed as a single entity and also blades in any slot can be plumbed and allocated as necessary to multiple uplinks. This is one level more flexible than the others which limits configurations of blades in a single chassis to similar uplink settings. Also, the HPE Synergy chassis itself supports 12 blades vs 10 in competitive offerings.
Read full review
IBM
Well there was a lot going for the vCE block systems we considered the 200 and 300 series. These two series seemed to overlap each other just about right where we are at in our IT needs. The 200 series leaned more to the less side of our needs and the 300 leaned to the farside of our needs. The vCE didn't appear to be compatible with a lot of our current configured components, while the PureSystem did. So that was the real clincher for us. We spent maybe a week integrating everything and testing to insure things had integrated as expected but it was well worth the effort and time.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Eased concerns for go-live of a huge new deployment as we knew we could respond to any scaling concern swiftly and thoroughly
  • Hardware has been rock solid since implementation
  • Limits to initially deployed logical enclosure configurations have been addressed rapidly by the introduction of new hardware with fast speeds/additional management ring connectivity options
Read full review
IBM
  • We were seeking a means to better leverage what we had without rebuilding the entire system, the PureSystem enabled us to do just that.
  • At first we were very hesitant of the system's robustness, it was to be honest a little intimidating, however with IBM always ready to hear our question no matter how small they might of seemed, we got rolling very quickly, I won't say effortlessly but very quickly.
  • When it came time on short notice that we needed greater storage and flexibility to incorporate some new application, the new system performed very well with incorporating the new applications and the increase of storage.
Read full review
ScreenShots