TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Hygraph

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AHygraph (previously GraphCMS) is a native GraphQL Headless Content Management System (CMS) and now evolved as a Federated Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to unify, structure, enrich and distribute content from anywhere to anywhere.

    $299

    per month

    Kontent.ai

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AKontent.ai is a headless CMS that helps content-driven organizations manage their content. Bringing greater speed, control, and governance to every aspect of content management, Kontent.ai helps them to publish better content faster. Kontent.ai is designed to accommodate every type of content workflow without sacrificing speed, compliance, or results. The vendor states Kontent.ai customers—including Elanco, Zurich Insurance, PPG, WebMD…

    $30,000

    per year (starting price)

    Pricing
    HygraphKontent.ai
    Editions & Modules
    Professional
    $299
    per month per project
    Scale
    $899
    per month per project
    Enterprise
    Custom
    Flexible Plan
    30,000
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HygraphKontent.ai
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details35% discount for annual pricing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    HygraphKontent.ai
    Hybrid CMS
    Comparison of Hybrid CMS features of Hygraph and Kontent.ai
    Feature
    Hygraph
    8.7
    1 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Kontent.ai
    -
    Ratings
    Collaborative editing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content templates10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Approval and authoring workflows8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Hygraph and Kontent.ai
    Feature
    Hygraph
    -
    Ratings
    Kontent.ai
    8.2
    1 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Hygraph and Kontent.ai
    Feature
    Hygraph
    -
    Ratings
    Kontent.ai
    9.1
    2 Ratings
    15% above category average
    API00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Hygraph and Kontent.ai
    Feature
    Hygraph
    -
    Ratings
    Kontent.ai
    8.5
    2 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Admin section00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings7.72 Ratings
    Publishing workflow00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of Hygraph and Kontent.ai
    Feature
    Hygraph
    -
    Ratings
    Kontent.ai
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Content taxonomy00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
    SEO support00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Bulk management00 Ratings7.32 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    HygraphKontent.ai
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Umbraco CMS
    Score7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Square Online
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    RWS Tridion Sites
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HygraphKontent.ai
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HygraphKontent.ai
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Hygraph
    I would recommend GraphCMS to anyone who is also using Gatsby to build their website. If not, I would recommend them to consider GraphCMS but also consider other options. GraphCMS is a tool in which you are responsible to make the most out of it, but sometimes this requires more time and knowledge than a normal engineer may be able to handle. But with more time and attention, the reward of off-lifting content creation from the developers is a huge time saver in the long run.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kontent.ai
    Really easy integration to all of our services and apps. Delivery API libraries make the integration really fast. On the other hand, I miss the option to use SSO (Single Sign-On) with the Professional version of the Kentico Kontent. However, it is included in the Enterprise package.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Hygraph
    • GraphCMS is easy to work with from the "non-engineer" side of things.
    • GraphCMS is very flexible on what data models we can create and how those models are formed.
    • GraphCMS uses Graph API, which is easy to write (compared to older API patterns).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kontent.ai
    • Management of multilingual content.
    • Content collaboration and control over the entire content lifecycle.
    • A well-documented delivery API and easy integration with any systems across the digital experience stack.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Hygraph
    • GraphCMS is very expensive at the enterprise level.
    • GraphCMS requires deep knowledge of the system and requires lots of time to be efficient with it (especially around creating specific data patterns/relationships).
    • Multiple times a day, the system will give us errors when attempting to save something but the errors are unclear as to what went wrong (can be irritating).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kontent.ai
    • Offer a smaller subscription package for small projects.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Hygraph
    We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of support from other developers which makes us confident will be around for a while (and we won't need to replace it anytime soon). Note: I also looked at Directus and DatoCMS but these were not options within TrustRadius
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kontent.ai
    Unified access to the same content without the need to duplicate it across multiple solutions. We do not need to set up a complicated infrastructure to start using the Kentico Kontent.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Hygraph
    • Better use of time for our engineers in the long run.
    • More control of content for people outside of the engineer team.
    • Allows people to edit the content on their own, so they don't need to wait until a developer is available to add something to the website.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kontent.ai
    • Highly positive ROI.
    • Shorten project delivery.
    • Single source of truth for all content.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Kontent.ai Screenshots

    Screenshot of the AI assistant that can bear the heavy workload of generating texts, summaries, translations, and variants. This enables human creators to deliver more strategic value and do their best work.Screenshot of Mission Control, which provides visibility and supports efficient content production from start to finish. By tracking team progress and pace in one place, it’s easier to catch issues early and keep everything on track.Screenshot of some of the workflow management tools, including user roles and permissions, available to help organizations meet stringent compliance standards and mitigate risk. Governance is non-negotiable for delivering consistent content.Screenshot of some of the tools available to adjust content when needed, without relying on developers. Fix typos, update key information, or issue corrections and deploy those changes everywhere in seconds.Screenshot of an example of how to close frustrating feedback loops, while making messaging stronger. Users can action feedback by leveraging suggestions, auto-replace, versioning, and tasks.