iBabs vs. Wolters Kluwer ActiveMeetings

iBabs

Wolters Kluwer ActiveMeetings

1 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
iBabs	N/A	N/A	iBabs is a board and committee meeting management platform that covers the full meeting lifecycle, from preparation to follow-up. Used by more than 300,000 people across 3,000+ organizations, iBabs saves boards up to 6 days a month on meeting preparation. Built-in voting, video conferencing, and digital signing keep meetings, approvals, and decisions in one ISO 27001 certified platform. Every decision and action item stays logged and searchable, accessible on any device, even offline, for…	N/A
ActiveMeetings	Score7 out of 10	N/A	Wolters Kluwer offers ActiveMeetings, software to organise and manage in-person or virtual Shareholder, Board or other formal meetings by the book. ActiveMeetings is a meeting management tool used by legal departments to organise meetings.	N/A

Pricing

iBabs

ActiveMeetings

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
iBabs	ActiveMeetings
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	No

Optional

No setup fee

—

—

User Ratings
	iBabs	ActiveMeetings
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	7.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	iBabs	ActiveMeetings
Likelihood to Recommend	iBabs No answers on this topic	Wolters Kluwer ActiveMeetings works well when you want to conduct pre-scheduled meets with a clear agenda and want to get inputs from stakeholders to close things quickly. It's not really so useful for general chit-chat or catchups with teammates as the extra features aren't useful in the scenario. It also has some friction when doing cross-org collaboration. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Pros	iBabs No answers on this topic	Wolters Kluwer Setting agenda for the meets Getting real-time inputs from meeting participants Seamless collaboration during meets Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Cons	iBabs No answers on this topic	Wolters Kluwer The UI interface could be much cleaner The cost of the software is high considering the value many free softwares provide Not everyone has ActiveMeetings so cross-organization collaboration has some friction Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Alternatives Considered	iBabs No answers on this topic	Wolters Kluwer ActiveMeetings offers much more power in terms of setting the course for the meeting, getting real-time inputs from stakeholders, and closing things on the go compared to Zoom or Google Meet. However the interface of ActiveMeetings isn't as clean as intuitive as it is with Zoom, and especially with Google Meet. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Return on Investment	iBabs No answers on this topic	Wolters Kluwer Meetings have become much more meeting with ActiveMeetings prompting for an agenda every time you set a meet You can club all relevant documents for the meet in one single doc which is really useful to avoid clutter and confusion This is still a hindrance when collaborating with people from a different organisation Incentivized Verified User Read full review
ScreenShots	iBabs Screenshots