Google Meet Review
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Pros
- It’s easy.
- It’s integrated with Slack, so you just need to type a command and the link is generated, ready. You don’t need to go do scheduling — it’s quick to get a link in order to initiate a meeting. So that’s really quick.
- Another thing is, it has an option for conversation in it, so I really like that you can have the video conferencing, and side by side, Q&A can also be taking place. You can either have a dedicated Q&A session going on, or you can have a global chat process also.
Cons
- One major one — I always say that we cannot send attachments during the meeting. Teams has that, so I believe Google should add that as well. Because you can have the conversation in the messages, but you can’t provide a file. So let’s say I have a technical conversation with someone, and I want to share a document, like an architecture diagram — I cannot send it. We have to use Gmail or Drive for that. It can be integrated for sure, so that’s an improvement that definitely can be done.
Return on Investment
- I would say, recently they introduced the transcription feature as well, so we can get the summary. It’s easy to conclude a meeting and send the minutes of the meeting very, very fast. Before, it used to take ages because you had to manually write down the notes — now Gemini does it for you. So that’s a big reduction in the manual effort we usually do. Also, the recurring meetings feature is something that I think really makes an impact. You don’t need to worry about rescheduling again and again — it does that for you.
- It’s positive. As I said, there are definitely some improvements to be made, because if everything is perfect, I think that’s not the best product — there’s always room for improvement.
