TrustRadius

IBM CICS Transaction Server vs. IBM OMEGAMON

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM CICS Transaction Server
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
IBM CICS (Customer Information Control System) is mixed-language application server that runs on IBM z/OS. CICS® Transaction Server, often called CICS, is used for hosting transactional enterprise applications in a hybrid architecture.N/A
IBM OMEGAMON
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
The IBM OMEGAMON product family for IBM Z mainframe and middleware subsystems presents a mainframe monitoring solution, a suite of products used to monitor and manage sophisticated mainframe applications and environments. The OMEGAMON products share a common technology, Tivoli® Management Services on z/OS®.N/A
Pricing
IBM CICS Transaction ServerIBM OMEGAMON
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM CICS Transaction ServerIBM OMEGAMON
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM CICS Transaction ServerIBM OMEGAMON
Considered Both Products
IBM CICS Transaction Server
Verified User
Manager
Chose IBM CICS Transaction Server
There is no comparison, in practice, the possibility of using the latest programming languages but, above all, the databases can be different and more modern than DL1.
IBM OMEGAMON
Verified User
Manager
Chose IBM OMEGAMON
Naturally, during the software selection, other tools from other similar vendors were compared as functionalities. more benchmarks have been made to control the Omegamon overhead on applications. certainly, it has influenced the fact that the mainframe base software is IBM and …
Features
IBM CICS Transaction ServerIBM OMEGAMON
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
IBM CICS Transaction Server
8.0
2 Ratings
0% above category average
IBM OMEGAMON
-
Ratings
IDE support5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM CICS Transaction ServerIBM OMEGAMON
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM CICS Transaction ServerIBM OMEGAMON
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM CICS Transaction ServerIBM OMEGAMON
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM CICS Transaction Server is multi-decades proven transaction server which is very scalable, very secured, easy to use, has good transactional capabilities, works well all other mainframe resources such as Db2, languages on IBM mainframe, has access control capabilities in terms of who can access the transaction for read mode vs update mode, etc.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
Certainly, the tool is useful for debugging applications and for real-time monitoring. It's a bit less useful, not to say useless when applications are client servers. We have used it heavily above all to optimize the DB/2 applications. We managed to reduce the need for additional MIPS year by year.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • De facto standard in the legacy enterprise
  • Multiplatform connection
  • Native connection with DB2
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
  • reliability
  • strength
  • effectiveness
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Would like to see the transaction response matrix on the average transaction response among all requests.
  • Would like to see GUI tool to be able to see currently running transactions
  • Would like to be able to get the details of where the cics transaction was triggered from
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
  • it itself consumes cpu
  • the interface is not user-friendly
  • every release migration is a surprise
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
There is no comparison, in practice, the possibility of using the latest programming languages but, above all, the databases can be different and more modern than DL1.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
Naturally, during the software selection, other tools from other similar vendors were compared as functionalities. more benchmarks have been made to control the Omegamon overhead on applications. certainly, it has influenced the fact that the mainframe base software is IBM and Omegamon is IBM so the compatibility problems are automatically solved.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • It has allowed us to use our decades old code and still continue to support the business
  • Allows us to have faster time to market and modernize our systems
  • We can still continue to use our legacy resources for modern systems
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
  • the baseline of mips under control
  • mic invoice flat
  • immediately resolve problems
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots