IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

IBM Cloud Private

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
IBM Cloud Private	Score 9.5 out of 10	N/A	IBM Cloud Private is a Kubernetes-based container platform allowing users to build cloud-native applications on their own infrastructure. In addition, it offers common services for self-service deployment, monitoring, logging and security, as well as middleware, data and analytics.	N/A
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes	Score 9.8 out of 10	N/A	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes provides end-to-end management visibility and control to manage a Kubernetes environment. Users take control of application modernization program with management capabilities for cluster creation, application lifecycle, and provide security and compliance for all of them across data centers and hybrid cloud environments. Clusters and applications are all visible and managed from a single console, with built-in security policies.	N/A

Pricing

IBM Cloud Private

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Private	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	IBM Cloud Private	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Top Pros	Pro Ibm cloud Pro Easy to use Pro Applications and services	No answers on this topic
Top Cons	Minus Take longer Minus Brand name Minus Machine learning	No answers on this topic

Features

IBM Cloud Private

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Platform-as-a-Service

Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
	IBM Cloud Private 9.7 5 Ratings 17% above category average	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes - Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces	10.03 Ratings	00 Ratings
Scalability	10.05 Ratings	00 Ratings
Platform management overhead	10.04 Ratings	00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability	10.04 Ratings	00 Ratings
Platform access control	9.04 Ratings	00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration	9.04 Ratings	00 Ratings
Development environment creation	10.04 Ratings	00 Ratings
Development environment replication	10.04 Ratings	00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification	9.04 Ratings	00 Ratings
Issue recovery	10.03 Ratings	00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes	10.03 Ratings	00 Ratings

Container Management

Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
	IBM Cloud Private - Ratings	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 8.4 1 Ratings 7% above category average
Security and Isolation	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Cluster Management	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Storage Management	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization	00 Ratings	8.01 Ratings
Discovery Tools	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks	00 Ratings	7.01 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery	00 Ratings	7.01 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging	00 Ratings	5.01 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	IBM Cloud Private	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Small Businesses	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score 9.1 out of 10	Portainer Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score 9.1 out of 10	IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score 9.1 out of 10	IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score 9.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	IBM Cloud Private	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend	10.0 (5 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	IBM Cloud Private	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend	IBM IBM Cloud Private is an ideal platform for companies to accelerate their business growth. It helps in reducing the cost of IT and operations while delivering a great customer experience. With IBM Cloud Private, you can gain agility and security with a flexible hybrid model that fits your needs. It's highly recommended to my colleagues from me. Incentivized Nosava Begum Human Resources Manager Read full review	Red Hat Well suited for - Large-scale Edge deployments of OpenShift instances. Policy-based consistency for all workloads is Less appropriate for - Small-scale deployments. Stand-alone deployments of K8s clusters. Deployments in the same data center. Asad Khan Systems Solution Architect Read full review
Pros	IBM Capacity On Demand to scale up and down environments SaaS model allows our team to have less involvement in managing or controlling the underlying cloud infrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, storage, or even individual application capabilities. SaaS model allows our team to worry less about upgrades, fix packs, environment support etc. Incentivized Bhaskara Rudraraju Tech Consultant (ODM and BPM) Read full review	Red Hat Continuous deployment of other OpenShift instances. Controls clusters and applications from a single console. Built-in Security & compliance. Asad Khan Systems Solution Architect Read full review
Cons	IBM Bluemix/IBM Cloud UI can be better Changing Brand name from Bluemix to IBM Cloud, as we are habituated to Bluemix more Incentivized Dinesh P Senior Infrastructure Engineer Read full review	Red Hat Initial deployment of the ACM itself needs to be made easy. Dependency on the Software versions of underlying open shift workloads during upgrades. LCM of ACM itself. Asad Khan Systems Solution Architect Read full review
Alternatives Considered	IBM With VMware cloud, each VMware Cloud customer must have an SDDC account(VMC) as well as a general AWS account. The two accounts must be linked for the service to work which is a tiresome thing to do for some clients but with IBM Cloud Private all these issues are solved. Incentivized Nosava Begum Human Resources Manager Read full review	Red Hat I have also used TNA by Google Cloud, but that is not mature enough as ACM. Right now, ACM is the best choice as a cluster manager for private cloud data centers. Asad Khan Systems Solution Architect Read full review
Return on Investment	IBM IBM Cloud has helped us start using the cloud and migrating old services to the cloud. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Red Hat Reduced the deployment duration of individual nodes by 50%. Acts as a central manager for all the clusters. Provides a lot of infrastructure options (storage, networking, etc) to build instances of your choice. Asad Khan Systems Solution Architect Read full review
ScreenShots