IBM Confluent vs. Nextflow Tower

Nextflow Tower

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
IBM Confluent	Score 9.1 out of 10	N/A	IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments.	$385 per month
Nextflow Tower	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Nextflow Tower is a centralized command post that enables collaborative data analysis at scale. With Tower, users can launch, manage, and monitor scalable Nextflow data analysis pipelines and compute environments on-premises or across the cloud provider of their choice. Nextflow Tower helps to accelerate research by enabling secure sharing and collaboration on public and private pipelines among local and remote teams. Researchers can focus on the science that…	N/A

Pricing

IBM Confluent

Nextflow Tower

Editions & Modules

Basic: $0
Standard: Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise: Starting at ~$1,150
per month

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
IBM Confluent	Nextflow Tower
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).

—

More Pricing Information

Pricing Info

Community Pulse
	IBM Confluent	Nextflow Tower

Best Alternatives
	IBM Confluent	Nextflow Tower
Small Businesses	Amazon SNS Score 8.7 out of 10	Skyvia Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Apache Kafka Score 8.9 out of 10	Astera Data Pipeline Builder (Centerprise) Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises	Apache Kafka Score 8.9 out of 10	Control-M Score 9.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	IBM Confluent	Nextflow Tower
Likelihood to Recommend	10.0 (2 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	IBM Confluent	Nextflow Tower
Likelihood to Recommend	IBM If you have a need to stream data, real time or segmented structured data then Confluent is a great platform to do so with. You won't run into packet transfer size limitations that other platforms have. Flexibility in on-prem, cloud, and managed cloud offerings makes it very flexible no matter how you choose to implement. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Seqera No answers on this topic
Pros	IBM Products work great. Training is available. Customer support is good. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Seqera No answers on this topic
Cons	IBM Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Seqera No answers on this topic
Support Rating	IBM The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Seqera No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	IBM For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Seqera No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	IBM It enables us to develop event driven application. It increases our ability to handle streaming data. It reduces latency of communication. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Seqera No answers on this topic
ScreenShots