IBM Confluent vs. Spotfire Streaming

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Confluent
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Confluent Platform for Z and LinuxONE is an enterprise event streaming platform designed to run on Linux on IBM Z and LinuxONE environments. It enables organizations to create, manage, and process real-time data streams using Apache Kafka-based technologies. The platform provides capabilities for event ingestion, data integration, stream processing, schema management, connectors, and operational management. It supports deployment models including virtual machines, containers, and Kubernetes…
$0
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.1 out of 10
N/A
The Spotfire Streaming (formerly TIBCO Streaming or StreamBase) platform is a high-performance system for rapidly building applications that analyze and act on real-time streaming data. Using Spotfire Streaming, users can rapidly build real-time systems and deploy them at a fraction of the cost and risk of other alternatives.N/A
Pricing
IBM ConfluentSpotfire Streaming
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0
Standard
Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise
Starting at ~$1,150
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM ConfluentSpotfire Streaming
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsConfluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM ConfluentSpotfire Streaming
Considered Both Products
IBM Confluent
Chose IBM Confluent
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others …
Chose IBM Confluent
We chose to use the Confluent Platform because they provide enterprise-grade customer service support. Whenever we have trouble setting up or using the service, we can create a ticket for them and it will be resolved pretty fast. Kafka is the open-source software that comes …
Spotfire Streaming
Chose Spotfire Streaming
We looked at these two, Apama uses it's own languages, meaning more devs to be hired.
SAS integrates with the SAS ecosystem, we were already using Tibco
Chose Spotfire Streaming
Did not select it because when I joined the company, StreamBase was already in place.
Chose Spotfire Streaming
Drools and Oracle Streaming Analytics
Chose Spotfire Streaming
No other complex event processing (CEP) was being compared.
Chose Spotfire Streaming
There are plenty of CEP alternative systems on the market, but the diagram editor is what makes Spotfire Streaming to stand out.
Chose Spotfire Streaming
We are using Dataflow (by Google).The development time in Spotfire Streaming is definitely shorter because its GUI based. Dataflow handles late arrivals after the window closes, not sure Spotfire Streaming can do that. Dataflow can run GCP as a managed service which is why we …
Chose Spotfire Streaming
I have not used other Spotfire products.
Chose Spotfire Streaming
We partner with Spotfire for many other product development projects, so we started with Spotfire Streaming due to our familiarity and comfort with Spotfire.
Chose Spotfire Streaming
Great visual programming is very useful and easy to learn. There's no need for learning a specific programming language just need to know business needs and the logic required. We are already able to provide a solution in a timely manner.
Chose Spotfire Streaming
Because we are very happy from our BW, EMS and BE products. So after great experience with those products, we decided to trust once again to Spotfire Streaming.
Chose Spotfire Streaming
Around 2010 a handful of vendors launched Complex Event Processing frameworks, of which Spotfire Streaming was one. Between competitors such as Coral8, Apama CEP and the open source EsperTech, we liked the well thought out way Spotfire Streaming implemented the CEP paradigm, …
Features
IBM ConfluentSpotfire Streaming
Streaming Analytics
Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IBM Confluent
-
Ratings
Spotfire Streaming
8.3
Ratings
6% above category average
Real-Time Data Analysis00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Low Latency00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Data wrangling and preparation00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Machine Learning Automation00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM ConfluentSpotfire Streaming
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.1 out of 10
IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM ConfluentSpotfire Streaming
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
5.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM ConfluentSpotfire Streaming
Likelihood to Recommend
If your company needs to build event-driven applications, like in healthcare industry, you need to enhance interoperability, and you are seeking a reliable service with enterprise-grade support, Confluent is the best on the market you can get. Their product works great and they provide very good customer service.
Read full review
Taking data from various sources including files, databases, web services, applying some complex rules, transforming, aggregating and producing a result. This is what Spotfire Streaming does best.
- If one needs connectivity to special services as secured databases or web services, building interactive web apps, those are probably tasks that shall be addressed with different tools.
Read full review
Pros
  • Products work great.
  • Training is available.
  • Customer support is good.
Read full review
  • Processing events in real-time with real low latency and high throughput.
  • 100% visual program language, which can be extended by common languages like Java, Python and .NET.
  • Reduced time to prototype, create an application and deployment, which reduces the software lifecycle.
  • Real robust engine and server. Barely heard of customers having issues in production.
Read full review
Cons
  • Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP
Read full review
  • Being a niche tool, there's not much community support
  • It is on prem, making it slow to boot. not cloud native (It could be that it is our org's issue)
  • The dev environment is very tough to understand for large projects due to the wire style UI/UX
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The usability is good in terms that it gets well integrated with the Spotfire suite but the only few issues I have is the tough UI/UX (learning curve, if the project is huge) and unable to find many users and devs to help with the queries. At the end it is solely based on the documentation provided which is never enough
Read full review
Support Rating
The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Read full review
Spotfire Streaming support is prompt and to the point. They help with best practices and learning from existing projects.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Read full review
We are using Dataflow (by Google).The development time in Spotfire Streaming is definitely shorter because its GUI based. Dataflow handles late arrivals after the window closes, not sure Spotfire Streaming can do that. Dataflow can run GCP as a managed service which is why we chose that tool for our new product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Confluent replaced Microsoft Event Hubs in our environment and unblocked data platform services rollout globally.
Read full review
  • While we haven't specifically integrated Spotfire Streaming into our product development, it has allowed us to see the benefits of real-time streaming data.
  • We have much more visibility into how our longer term roadmap will look and what we should focus on.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Spotfire Streaming Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of