IBM Confluent vs. Sybase Event Stream Processor (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Confluent
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments.
$385
per month
Sybase Event Stream Processor (discontinued)
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Base on the former Aleri product, Sybase Event Stream Processor, from SAP, is currently discontinued and no longer supported, or available for sale.N/A
Pricing
IBM ConfluentSybase Event Stream Processor (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0
Standard
Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise
Starting at ~$1,150
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM ConfluentSybase Event Stream Processor (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsConfluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM ConfluentSybase Event Stream Processor (discontinued)
Best Alternatives
IBM ConfluentSybase Event Stream Processor (discontinued)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

IBM Confluent
IBM Confluent
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.1 out of 10
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM ConfluentSybase Event Stream Processor (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM ConfluentSybase Event Stream Processor (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
If you have a need to stream data, real time or segmented structured data then Confluent is a great platform to do so with. You won't run into packet transfer size limitations that other platforms have. Flexibility in on-prem, cloud, and managed cloud offerings makes it very flexible no matter how you choose to implement.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
These complex event processing platforms have the ability to process to multiple streams of data with low latency and ability to scale up well. It provides the ability to analyze streaming data real time and establish/investigate patterns with this streaming data and also deals with high-speed data very well.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Products work great.
  • Training is available.
  • Customer support is good.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Ability to capture data and investigate data for pattern fairly quickly
  • Integrates well with Sybase database
  • Ability to do data modeling
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Configuring data streams could be made more intuitive to users
  • Sometimes debugger tools are very slow
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
IBM WebSphere business elements which was more complex to set up and also more expensive especially in a large SAP environment, We were also looking to get ramped up with the product with minimal learning curve especially with good documentation available to get started with the product as well as the ability to deploy and maintain with relative ease on an ongoing basis.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • It enables us to develop event driven application.
  • It increases our ability to handle streaming data.
  • It reduces latency of communication.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • A positive impact on real-time analysis and patterns from streaming data
  • Good speed
  • Good documentation for setup
  • No negative impact
Read full review
ScreenShots