IBM Confluent vs. Tanzu Application Catalog
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Confluent | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
Tanzu Application Catalog | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | The Tanzu Application Catalog (or Bitnami) provides packaged applications for any platform. The platform delivers and maintains a catalog of 130+ ready-to-run server applications and development environments in partnership with cloud providers including Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Oracle, driving over 1.5 million deployments per month. Bitnami was acquired by VMware in 2019. | $0.50 per month |
| IBM Confluent | Tanzu Application Catalog | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Tanzu Application Catalog | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| IBM Confluent | Tanzu Application Catalog | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Tanzu Application Catalog | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Confluent | Tanzu Application Catalog | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.8 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| IBM Confluent | Tanzu Application Catalog | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |
