IBM Confluent vs. TIBCO Streaming
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Confluent | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
TIBCO Streaming | Score5 out of 10 | N/A | TIBCO Streaming is a platform for building real-time streaming analytics applications. It analyzes live data from sources such as market data feeds, message buses, and sensors, applies logic to it as it arrives, and publishes the results as queryable live tables and alerts. It bundles an event processing server, a development environment, a live data server, and connectors to data sources and sinks. | N/A |
| IBM Confluent | TIBCO Streaming | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | TIBCO Streaming | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
94% Would buy again 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
94% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
88% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| IBM Confluent | TIBCO Streaming | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming Analytics |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | TIBCO Streaming | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 | Amazon Kinesis Score10 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 | IBM Streams (discontinued) Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Confluent | TIBCO Streaming | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.6 | 5.0 |
| Usability | 7.4 | 7.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| IBM Confluent | TIBCO Streaming | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | TIBCO Streaming Screenshots |




