TrustRadius

IBM DevOps Code ClearCase vs. pgAdmin

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM DevOps Code ClearCase
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
An enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets.N/A
pgAdmin
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
IBM DevOps Code ClearCasepgAdmin
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM DevOps Code ClearCasepgAdmin
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM DevOps Code ClearCasepgAdmin
Best Alternatives
IBM DevOps Code ClearCasepgAdmin
Small Businesses
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 6.8 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 6.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM DevOps Code ClearCasepgAdmin
Likelihood to Recommend
3.3
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM DevOps Code ClearCasepgAdmin
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM Rational ClearCase might be better suited for a smaller / simpler code base. Larger code bases really slow it down... but then again there are better alternatives out there for source control
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
pgAdmin
We use pgAdmin to develop and test database schemas, write and debug SQL queries. The debugging and profiling tools are particularly useful in this context Instead for applications requiring real-time data processing and minimal latency, pgAdmin might not be suitable due to its potential performance limitations. Idem with large database
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Rational ClearCase is excellent for handling versioning and branching. No other tool I've used has the depth that ClearCase has when it comes to handling complex branching scenarios and identifying where certain versions of particular files are within a particular configuration.
  • Rational ClearCase handles parallel development of many dependent applications really well.
  • The use of ClearCase Views to switch between projects and configurations is extremely convenient as opposed to the local workstation model of the competitors.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
pgAdmin
  • interface user friendly
  • export query result in mani format (xls,csv)
  • fast
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Extremely buggy.
  • Sometimes the repository gets locked for no reason.
  • Slow.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
pgAdmin
  • Connection profile can be improved
  • With large Database can result too slow
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
pgAdmin
Interface is almost user friendly and can be improve on connection management
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
If development is centrallized to one location and your company releases hundreds of customized versions of your software per year, then ClearCase is the best tool for managing the complexity of multiple versions of customized software. If your company has globally distributed development, then I'd recommend Team Foundation Server over ClearCase. If your organization uses Agile Methodologies, then I'd recommend TFS with GIT.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
pgAdmin
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Managed code versioning for many years.
  • Only one person can edit code at a time - slows processing down.
  • IBM is an expensive product to support.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
pgAdmin
  • query tool to go inside log and search for unauthorized access
  • view in real time statistics data growth
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots