IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) vs. Sophos Virtualization Security

IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) works great in scenarios where there is a need to process sensitive data within a secure enclave. IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) isn’t suitable as a commodity solution for general purpose compute. The IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers For Virtual Private Cloud have less CPUs and available RAM than some x86 virtual machines on IBM Cloud. In other words, using IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) to process generic data doesn’t make much sense. You may be able to get more compute for your money by processing generic data using an x86 architecture server on IBM Cloud or another public cloud provider.

For our small and medium-sized businesses Sophos Virtualization Security has been a perfect fit. I barely recognize it is even in place as an end user, and as a manager my team never complains - it just works and works very well. If you want an easy to use and seamless solution, this is it.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Process sensitive data within a secure enclave
• Support for common Infrastructure As Code containerized solutions
• Healthy marketplace for cybersecurity analytics solutions

• Antivirus is old hat for Sophos - we haven't had a single breach since its implementation
• Managing and deploying Sophos was very seamless
• Its non-intrusive nature to the end user has been better than any of our prior options.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Support for S390X and x86 architectures in managed Kubernetes
• Some common frameworks don’t support big-endian architectures. We had to migrate from Apache Parquet to MessagePack because S390X doesn’t support Apache Parquet. Although MessagePack or Protobufs works fine on S390X, it would be nice to have a page of common databases, serialization formats, etc. that have S390X support.
• Improve the non-native S390X development tools and guides. Most development machines aren’t built on the S390X architecture.

• Instead of automatically installing our previous solution, we had to manually do it, but it may have been that solution that caused the issue.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

I scored IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)’s usability based on its intended use case as a secure enclave to process sensitive data. By design, IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) instances have more restrictions than a regular x86 architecture server on IBM Cloud. With this additional context in mind, I rated IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) an 8 out of 10 because setting up and deploying an IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) instance is relatively easy. IBM has detailed step-by-step tutorials on how to accomplish this. However, IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) lacks mixed support for S390X and x86 architectures in managed Kubernetes. Also, there aren’t enough tutorials on how to do anything outside of setting up and deploying an IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) instance.

Amazon Virtual Private Cloud and Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud are two competing products we evaluated prior to selecting IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC). We selected IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) over Amazon Virtual Private Cloud and Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud because of security and IBM’s stellar reputation as an industry leader in cybersecurity.

Sophos Virtualization Security has the brand recognition and the customer support that really sold us on the solution. The pricing was also very competetive and Sophos came highly suggested from our vendor and references.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Early-stage startups which process sensitive data face adoption headwinds because their customers are very risk-averse. For example, we discovered that the Operations Team at prospective customers really wanted [...], but the IT Security Team would veto their decision.
• After describing to the IT Security Teams how [...] uses IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) to keep patient data safe, we have had more success convincing healthcare facilities to try [...]. Currently, we are pursuing three opportunities which can be directly attributed to our use of IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC).
• Our use of IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC), the “Fort Knox of data security”, plays an important role in winning over prospective customers’ IT Security Teams. By using IBM Hyper Protect Services’ confidential computing capabilities to keep protected health information safe, we make a strong commitment to protecting our customers.

• Security is like life insurance - you can spend as much as you want and still not be fully covered... but with Sophos, you don't have to overly spend to feel covered.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info