IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) vs. Trellix MOVE AntiVirus

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) is a fully managed confidential compute container runtime that enables the deployment of sensitive containerized workloads in a highly isolated environment with technical assurance.N/A
Trellix MOVE AntiVirus
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Trellix MOVE AntiVirus (formerly McAfee MOVE AntiVirus) provides zero day threat protection for virtual servers and desktops, and works across all major hypervisors. The solution presents an agentless, tuned option works on VMware NSX and VMware vCloud Networking and Security.N/A
Pricing
IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Trellix MOVE AntiVirus
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Trellix MOVE AntiVirus
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Trellix MOVE AntiVirus
Best Alternatives
IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Trellix MOVE AntiVirus
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Trend Micro Deep Security
Trend Micro Deep Security
Score 8.5 out of 10
Trend Micro Deep Security
Trend Micro Deep Security
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Trellix MOVE AntiVirus
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.9
(4 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Trellix MOVE AntiVirus
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) works great in scenarios where there is a need to process sensitive data within a secure enclave. IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) isn’t suitable as a commodity solution for general purpose compute. The IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers For Virtual Private Cloud have less CPUs and available RAM than some x86 virtual machines on IBM Cloud. In other words, using IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) to process generic data doesn’t make much sense. You may be able to get more compute for your money by processing generic data using an x86 architecture server on IBM Cloud or another public cloud provider.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Earlier, we were using the free version of antivirus but it is allowing some of the viruses and not protecting more. So After using McAfee MOVE AntiVirus we were confident about security and privacy. As we found some scenarios where it has given us an alert regarding the virus and we have successfully removed it.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Process sensitive data within a secure enclave
  • Support for common Infrastructure As Code containerized solutions
  • Healthy marketplace for cybersecurity analytics solutions
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • It ensures the protection of our servers and fights back with viruses.
  • It is able to sustain equilibrium.
  • We don’t have to have a massive kind of free storage to make it work.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Support for S390X and x86 architectures in managed Kubernetes
  • Some common frameworks don’t support big-endian architectures. We had to migrate from Apache Parquet to MessagePack because S390X doesn’t support Apache Parquet. Although MessagePack or Protobufs works fine on S390X, it would be nice to have a page of common databases, serialization formats, etc. that have S390X support.
  • Improve the non-native S390X development tools and guides. Most development machines aren’t built on the S390X architecture.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Not really any concerns for the remote user.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
I scored IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)’s usability based on its intended use case as a secure enclave to process sensitive data. By design, IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) instances have more restrictions than a regular x86 architecture server on IBM Cloud. With this additional context in mind, I rated IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) an 8 out of 10 because setting up and deploying an IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) instance is relatively easy. IBM has detailed step-by-step tutorials on how to accomplish this. However, IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) lacks mixed support for S390X and x86 architectures in managed Kubernetes. Also, there aren’t enough tutorials on how to do anything outside of setting up and deploying an IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) instance.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Have not had to access a great deal of additional support. The installation is smooth and online tutorials quick and user friendly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Amazon Virtual Private Cloud and Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud are two competing products we evaluated prior to selecting IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC). We selected IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) over Amazon Virtual Private Cloud and Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud because of security and IBM’s stellar reputation as an industry leader in cybersecurity.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Reve is not so smart tool and was not enough for us I protecting our system files and optimizing our virtual atmosphere. We have been in search of a complete tool which Reve was not. Another factor was its pricing. On the other hand, McAfee is a safe tool and is available at a highly reasonable price.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Early-stage startups which process sensitive data face adoption headwinds because their customers are very risk-averse. For example, we discovered that the Operations Team at prospective customers really wanted [...], but the IT Security Team would veto their decision.
  • After describing to the IT Security Teams how [...] uses IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) to keep patient data safe, we have had more success convincing healthcare facilities to try [...]. Currently, we are pursuing three opportunities which can be directly attributed to our use of IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC).
  • Our use of IBM Hyper Protect Virtual Servers for Virtual Private Cloud (VPC), the “Fort Knox of data security”, plays an important role in winning over prospective customers’ IT Security Teams. By using IBM Hyper Protect Services’ confidential computing capabilities to keep protected health information safe, we make a strong commitment to protecting our customers.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • It is not costly so it is not burdened so we got peace of mind with the usage of this into the system.
  • We are using our machine without worry. It saved our money to take backup with multiple devices.
Read full review
ScreenShots