TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities vs. SAP Process Control

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly Tririga) is an integrated workplace management system (IWMS) supporting facilities management, real estate portfolio management, space management, and environmental / energy management.N/A

    SAP Process Control

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ASAP Process Control Simplifies uses continuous control monitoring, and streamlined testing, and reduces risk with real-time insight into control status and key issues. It can be deployed on premise or in the cloud.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesSAP Process Control
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesSAP Process Control
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesSAP Process Control
    Governance, Risk & Compliance
    Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities and SAP Process Control
    Feature
    IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
    -
    Ratings
    SAP Process Control
    7.0
    3 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Common repository of GRC items00 Ratings9.83 Ratings
    Risk management00 Ratings6.13 Ratings
    Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    GRC policy management00 Ratings7.83 Ratings
    Incident management00 Ratings6.12 Ratings
    User Ratings
    IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesSAP Process Control
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    7.9
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesSAP Process Control
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    It is great for organizations who have complex data or large amounts of data. For an organization that has small amounts of data or very simple processes TRIRIGA might be too much. It can handle small data and processes but the costs of implementing and supporting might be greater than the reward that would be provided. It also has a lot of room to grow. You can utilize existing forms and business objects or you can custom build new ones to fit business needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    In my opinion, SAP Process Control is well suited for bigger companies with an already mature Internal Control System as well as for bigger companies who want to completely new/redesign the internal control system. The size of the company, as well as the budget, is quite important when thinking about the implementation of SAP Process Control. A smaller company with e.g., 150 people should think more about implementing SAP FCM.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Diverse categories of requests available
    • Ability to be as descriptive as possible without character limit
    • Ease of mass resource assignment for tasks
    • Ease of mass maintenance task/request printing work orders
    • Clean site layout that is easy to navigate
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Native connection to SAP applications
    • Automated monitoring process of SAP applications
    • Workflow capabilities for control testing
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • In order to get into the back end and manage spaces, there are too many "clicks" and pop up boxes to get to the area that is needed, which causes delays and confusions.
    • It can be a bit slow when processing requests, pulling up maps.
    • Trigia holds a lot of information, which is good but it could be easier to get to at times.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Default delivery of controls could be done by SAP on some basic controls like client openings, password controls, etc
    • The messaging or customization of messages in different workflows is limited, which could be introduced to enhance the product
    • SAP Process control does not have the capability for cloud product monitoring which is required with more SAP cloud products available right now
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    I give it this rating because it has more than one way to get to most forms but it can be hard to navigate if you don't know the terms TRIRIGA uses. Also being a new developer can bring up issues with not knowing exactly where certain things are found. The documentation doesn't help too much sometimes since the TRIRIGA community is pretty small.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    In the almost 7 months I have been working on my current project there has been exactly one unplanned outage. This was in the QA environment during data migration and was caused by a workflow that was circular and self referencing which caused the processing JAVA memory to spike, not resolve and then crash the server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    IBM
    TRIRIGA does a good job of this, being a server based web application it is like other web based systems so it's not as fast as a client server application or a local system but it is very consistent across locations and for different roles and employees. This does allow consistent use no matter where people are located. It also does a fair job of notifying the user when it is loading with the spinning circle or hour glass. The reports can get fairly complex but native TRIRIGA reports perform well even when they are complex. They can be a little slow if they are fetching 100's of 1000's of rows but this doesn't take more than 10 or so seconds. I have yet to write a native report that takes more than 20 seconds and that 20 second report is getting data from 4 BO's and nets over 130K rows.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    The process does seem to take some time and has to go through a preset escalation process. IBM does a good job of communicating through the process, it just seems to take it's natural course.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    Do research on the client processes and determine which modules need to be implemented and in which order they should be implemented in.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Much faster web based program with more category options and ease of mass batch printing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    The connectivity with other SAP products out of the SAP GRC suite, like Access Control and so on, was key for the decision. Also we had an already mature SAP System landscape as well as having internal processes that were similar to the SAP Process Control standard processes helped us with the decision to implement SAP Process Control.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    TRIRIGA can be split into many servers and is easily scaled over multiple environments. TRIRIGA is also capable of being implemented on multiple operating systems and a wide range of environments with different database management systems. This makes it easy for clients to choose since they can choose vendors they have previous relationships with or are required to use for various reasons.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • It's a positive and works well with the business.
    • It doesn't "stand out" from competitors but has great potential if updates were establisthed.
    • The pros outweigh the cons when using Tririga.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Automated alerts for controls issues
    • Workflow capabilities; however, there's natively only 2 levels of review. More layers would be beneficial.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots