IBM OMEGAMON vs. SYSVIEW Performance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM OMEGAMON
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
The IBM OMEGAMON product family for IBM Z mainframe and middleware subsystems presents a mainframe monitoring solution, a suite of products used to monitor and manage sophisticated mainframe applications and environments. The OMEGAMON products share a common technology, Tivoli® Management Services on z/OS®.N/A
SYSVIEW Performance Management
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
SYSVIEW performance management from Broadcom is a mainframe monitoring solution providing unified real-time visibility into mainframe application performance and transaction flows enable easier analysis between captures.N/A
Pricing
IBM OMEGAMONSYSVIEW Performance Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM OMEGAMONSYSVIEW Performance Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM OMEGAMONSYSVIEW Performance Management
Considered Both Products
IBM OMEGAMON

No answer on this topic

SYSVIEW Performance Management
Chose SYSVIEW Performance Management
SYSVIEW replaced TMON. Today it seems like a good choice. We tried OMEGAMON and just couldn't get it to work the way we liked.
User Ratings
IBM OMEGAMONSYSVIEW Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM OMEGAMONSYSVIEW Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Certainly, the tool is useful for debugging applications and for real-time monitoring. It's a bit less useful, not to say useless when applications are client servers. We have used it heavily above all to optimize the DB/2 applications. We managed to reduce the need for additional MIPS year by year.
Read full review
Broadcom
Any z/OS monitoring. I don't know of any performance monitoring scenario where it doesn't excel.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • reliability
  • strength
  • effectiveness
Read full review
Broadcom
  • Show system Status
  • Show DASD status
  • Show USS details
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • it itself consumes cpu
  • the interface is not user-friendly
  • every release migration is a surprise
Read full review
Broadcom
  • Non that I know of
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Naturally, during the software selection, other tools from other similar vendors were compared as functionalities. more benchmarks have been made to control the Omegamon overhead on applications. certainly, it has influenced the fact that the mainframe base software is IBM and Omegamon is IBM so the compatibility problems are automatically solved.
Read full review
Broadcom
SYSVIEW replaced TMON. Today it seems like a good choice. We tried OMEGAMON and just couldn't get it to work the way we liked.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • the baseline of mips under control
  • mic invoice flat
  • immediately resolve problems
Read full review
Broadcom
  • It makes finding performance problems quick and easy
Read full review
ScreenShots