TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM OpenPages vs. Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM OpenPages

    Score9.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM OpenPages is a governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) platform.N/A

    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft R Open and Revolution R Enterprise are big data R distribution for servers, Hadoop clusters, and data warehouses. Microsoft acquired original developer Revolution Analytics in 2016. Microsoft R is available in two editions: Microsoft R Open (formerly Revolution R Open) and Revolution R Enterprise.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM OpenPagesMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM OpenPagesMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    IBM OpenPagesMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Platform Connectivity
    Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of IBM OpenPages and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    IBM OpenPages
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    5.3
    3 Ratings
    45% below category average
    Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings6.13 Ratings
    Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    MDM Integration00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
    Data Exploration
    Comparison of Data Exploration features of IBM OpenPages and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    IBM OpenPages
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    7.0
    3 Ratings
    19% below category average
    Visualization00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of IBM OpenPages and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    IBM OpenPages
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    4.8
    3 Ratings
    53% below category average
    Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings5.13 Ratings
    Data Transformations00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
    Data Encryption00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
    Built-in Processors00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    Platform Data Modeling
    Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of IBM OpenPages and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    IBM OpenPages
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    6.0
    3 Ratings
    34% below category average
    Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
    Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
    Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
    Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    Model Deployment
    Comparison of Model Deployment features of IBM OpenPages and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    IBM OpenPages
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    6.5
    2 Ratings
    27% below category average
    Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
    Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings6.92 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM OpenPagesMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    RapidMiner
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Anaconda
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Watson Studio
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM OpenPagesMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (5 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM OpenPagesMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    If you are a MS shop specifically, or have more generic data requirement needs from Microsoft sourced data this will work well. If you have a lot of disparate data across a number of unique platforms/cloud systems/3rd party hosted data warehouses then this product will have issues or a lack of documentation on the net. Performance-wise this product is equal to other R platforms out there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    • It allows distributed algorithm runs on Hadoop HDFS cluster
    • It allows using different file formats such as SAS7BAT files or complex files in tab or comma delimited making data munging easier
    • It provides scalable solutions by allowing users to re-use R scripts and distributing the computing over nodes through RHadoop
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    • Very steep learning curve... for such a quick and useful tool the learning curve is unacceptable.
    • Very dangerous in the wrong hands. Because most add-ons are pre-written, you have to trust the community that malicious script is not used.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    In general, Revolution Analytics brings a lot of value to the organization. The renewal decision would be based on return on investment in terms of quantified actionable insights that are getting generated against the cost of the product. Additionally, market brand of the tool and reputation risk in terms of possible acquisition and its impact to overall organizational analytic strategy would be considered as well.
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    It is good, easy to use, improvements are being made to the product and more info being shared in the community. It just needs some more time to become more integrated to other platforms and tools/data out there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Generally support comes through the forums and user generated channels which are helpful, easy to access, quickly turned around and provided by knowledgeable users. However the support channels are not employees and the channels are often used as a way to learn quick difficult elements of R. Better design, users interface and tutorial options would alleviate the need for this sort of interaction.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    The two are different products for different purposes. But for someone who has little or no experience in R programming, Power BI would be better for starting with. Having said that, Microsoft R is built on R, thus allowing for customization of complex calculations not typically available otherwise.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    • Helped save company money versus buying other stat software
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots