IBM SAN48B-5 vs. NetApp AFF A-Series

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM SAN48B-5
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM's SAN48B-5 is a SAN option.N/A
NetApp AFF A-Series
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
NetApp AFF A-Series All Flash Arrays are the company's flagship flash storage solutions.N/A
Pricing
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp AFF A-Series
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp AFF A-Series
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp AFF A-Series
Features
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp AFF A-Series
Enterprise Flash Array Storage
Comparison of Enterprise Flash Array Storage features of Product A and Product B
IBM SAN48B-5
-
Ratings
NetApp AFF A-Series
8.4
8 Ratings
6% below category average
Flash Array Performance00 Ratings9.28 Ratings
Flash Array Integration00 Ratings9.27 Ratings
Data Compression00 Ratings6.87 Ratings
Non-Intrusive Upgrades00 Ratings8.47 Ratings
Simplicity00 Ratings8.88 Ratings
Power Savings00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp AFF A-Series
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Score 9.5 out of 10
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
NetApp AFF A-Series
NetApp AFF A-Series
Score 8.8 out of 10
Dell VMAX
Dell VMAX
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp AFF A-Series
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.2
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp AFF A-Series
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
In my experience with this equipment we have installed it for clients with different characteristics, in manufacturing companies with the configuration between their virtual environment and storage, in clients with storage in different sites making communication and data transfer between them, also in clients with SAP HANA where servers from different platforms and storage communicate
Read full review
NetApp
Easy interface and the accessibility of the features are effective and this solution functionalities on data migration and processing of different from other packages is amazing. NetApp AFF A-Series All Flash Arrays is the most secure platform for easy management of all the business and project data and the capacity planning tools and even the configuration options are the best and easy to use.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • The ease of configuration
  • Ease of administration
  • Growth according to usage needs
Read full review
NetApp
  • Protective multiple project and business data is excellent.
  • Solutions for data storage and data migration.
  • Providing useful and quality data reports is effective.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • the graphical administration interface
  • the help of options and/or parameters of the commands that is broader
  • Make software and firmware updates more user-friendly
Read full review
NetApp
  • Cost is still prohibitive for performance.
  • Performance tuning at the Fabric Interconnect level.
  • Automation and scripting improvements in the PowerShell module.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
for being a product, reliable, safe and easy to use
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
NetApp
Our organizations primary storage platform is NetApp AFF-A900 nodes. All our storage requirements, be it storage visible to our compute either using FC or NFS is through these nodes. The shares or CIFS too are setup on these nodes. We also use the fabric pool to write the data to NetApps Storage Grid
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
This equipment model was selected for the characteristics it has which perfectly covered the functionality requirement in the implementations that were carried out, also for the ease of installation, configuration, administration and growth that it has. Customers have been satisfied with all the benefits of the equipment and above all that it is not necessary to invest too much time in its administration, since once implemented nothing else has to be done and the maintenance time used is the minimum since it is a very reliable and safe team
Read full review
NetApp
I have been an IBM and EMC storage customer. I used EMC CX and VMX series SANs. I have used IBM Shark SANs before that. Much has changed over the years. It is my experience that Netapp has shown a great deal more innovation with large leaps in technology, ease of use and an aggressive progress while the two other vendors that I have experience with are more tied to their legacy technologies.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • installation and configuration in less time, that makes it more economical
  • Easier administration
  • The support given is minimal, which makes the staff carry out other productive activities.
Read full review
NetApp
  • ROI has been tremendous as it has come in handy in all the scenarios we were looking at
  • Users and admins both happy with the overall performance and management is happy that they got a good deal from reseller.
Read full review
ScreenShots