IBM SAN48B-5 vs. NetApp FAS Storage Arrays

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM SAN48B-5
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM's SAN48B-5 is a SAN option.N/A
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
NetApp's FAS series systems offers a storage array system for enterprises.N/A
Pricing
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Score 8.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
NetApp AFF A-Series
NetApp AFF A-Series
Score 9.6 out of 10
NetApp AFF A-Series
NetApp AFF A-Series
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.7
(13 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM SAN48B-5NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
In my experience with this equipment we have installed it for clients with different characteristics, in manufacturing companies with the configuration between their virtual environment and storage, in clients with storage in different sites making communication and data transfer between them, also in clients with SAP HANA where servers from different platforms and storage communicate
Read full review
NetApp
It is very easy to use with NFS. Creating new volumes and mounting to servers such as ESXi or Linux is a breeze. It does also support CIFS but it is far less intuitive and requires much more effort. Replicated data is also very simple and robust in the form of SnapVaults or SnapMirrors. This data is either immediately or periodically replicated to a peer FAS in the cluster for retention.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • The ease of configuration
  • Ease of administration
  • Growth according to usage needs
Read full review
NetApp
  • The selling point for NetApp FAS is the application and data protection integration capabilities they provide.
  • We have been able to use NetApp FAS in a variety of use cases with a standard set of management tools.
  • NetApp FAS has evolved over the years from just NAS to also include block protocols. At this time they support almost all industry standard protocols.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • the graphical administration interface
  • the help of options and/or parameters of the commands that is broader
  • Make software and firmware updates more user-friendly
Read full review
NetApp
  • Deduplication job runs at certain times and creates a large CPU overhead for the system
  • Management of a volumes, disk groups, LUNs, etc. is a burden to manage and is not efficient with storage capacity
  • Upgrades are complicated and not "non-disruptive"
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
for being a product, reliable, safe and easy to use
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
NetApp
It does have a really nice and easy to use web interface to do pretty much anything you need with it. It was very simple to configure our volumes and luns and connect them to our VMWare environment using the interface. It has options to rename, shrink, grow, and other things with our luns and volumes. It was nice and easy to read graphs to see where you stand on your storage usage at a glance.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
NetApp
NetApp support in Brazil is managed by its partners. We know in other countries, such as the US and NO, they have support directly from Netapp. We have a very good NetApp partner working with us since the beginning, on both the implementation and daily support. Very few cases needed to be escalated to NetApp support, most of the cases are handled and satisfyingly closed by the partner.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
This equipment model was selected for the characteristics it has which perfectly covered the functionality requirement in the implementations that were carried out, also for the ease of installation, configuration, administration and growth that it has. Customers have been satisfied with all the benefits of the equipment and above all that it is not necessary to invest too much time in its administration, since once implemented nothing else has to be done and the maintenance time used is the minimum since it is a very reliable and safe team
Read full review
NetApp
NetApp stacked nicely and gave enterprise-level usability for snapshot-based backups. Our previous RPO was several hours. It was selected prior to me arriving at the company, but It was selected for the hardware refreshes due to its compatibility with several other vendors, like CommVault and VMware.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • installation and configuration in less time, that makes it more economical
  • Easier administration
  • The support given is minimal, which makes the staff carry out other productive activities.
Read full review
NetApp
  • The speed of file recovery is the biggest positive impact. Recovering from a ransomware attack in minutes is something you can certainly brag about.
  • Integration with products like Exchange and SQL can certainly speed up normal day to day processes. Not just in backup recovery situations either.
  • Redundant paths make migrations and updates very easy with no downtime.
Read full review
ScreenShots