IBM Security QRadar EDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that can be deployed instantly from a browser and managed from a single console. | N/A |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 5.0 |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots | WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Screenshots |








