IBM Security QRadar SIEM vs. Picus Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Security QRadar is security information and event management (SIEM) Software.N/A
Picus Security
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Picus Security, headquartered in San Francisco, offers Continuous Security Validation and Mitigation as the most proactive approach to ensure cyber-resilience. The Picus Platform measures the effectiveness of defenses by using emerging threat samples in production environments, providing the insight required to build the right security strategy to better manage complex operations.N/A
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar SIEMPicus Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Security QRadar SIEMPicus Security
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Security QRadar SIEMPicus Security
Considered Both Products
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Due to its performance, it is a more practical way to analyze and respond to an incident. It is a graphic with good interaction and multiple integrated platforms.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
I would always recommend Splunk over IBM Security QRadar SIEM unless you're trying to save money or only onboarding and normalizing well known data sources. IBM Security QRadar SIEM doesn't seem to handle RBA and complicated, chaining correlation rules very effectively and if I …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
We chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM not only because it was a leader but because it convinced us it was a solid product suitable for multiple scenarios but most importantly we needed a really secure and powerful software for our infrastructure.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
IBM Security QRadar SIEM has been quite a revolutionary siem solution compared to its counterparts. Be it the use case building to maintaining log source integrations, Qradar has proved to be one of the most efficient and easy to use solution. Having IBM SOAR along with the …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Because is easy to use and if you don't have analysts with database language skills IBM Security QRadar SIEM is easy to use in comparison to Splunk.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Because they are the best and most used tools in the Cyber ​​Security market for event correlation.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
It provides practicality by containing several domains in a single tenant and being able to subdivide them in a single place, in addition to the fact that the price is very competitive in the market.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
The QRadar licensing process is based on EPS (Events Per Second) and there are no limitations on event collection, regardless of the origin of the logs. This becomes an advantage as the price is agreed between the parties before purchase, so you have knowledge of what you can …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
We select a IBM Security QRadar SIEM because is better to integrate a our SIEM QRADAR.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
I still don't have experience with other SIEM solutions.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
ArcSight is more difficult to understand and administer, and it looks more like a box for programming and needs a lot of high-level skills personnel. IBM Security QRadar SIEM is well suited for organization cybersecurity in large and medium organizations. IBM Security QRadar …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Qradar is on my top choice because I have hands-on experience on it. on qradar it is much easier to investigate in case of any incident happend.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
IBM Security QRadar SIEM offers a wide range of features and capabilities, such as behavioral analysis, event correlation and incident management, making it a robust and effective choice.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Rapid7 InsightIDR and Paladion
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
QRadar's open architecture is easy to integrate with a wide range of security tools and third-party applications, which are available at the IBM X-force library to enhance overall flexibility. Its powerful analytics and correlation capabilities provide advanced threat detection …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
I would take below parameters to say IBM Security QRadar SIEM is better than other SIEM tools such as netwitness SIEM"

1) Easy to Use
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
I found that IBM Security QRadar SIEM has better threat detection methods and the identification of cyber kill chains followed by attackers. Analysis of the data gives visibility that other SIEM solutions need to improve. Integration in IBM Security QRadar SIEM is also better …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
User friendly and use case management portal which helps to get brief idea about security posture based on mitre mapping is best thing i have experienced in qradar.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
price, to be honest IBM Security QRadar SIEM package is very good for most customers than Splunk and Sentinel
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
IBM Qradar takes the best from its competitors. Reliable and stable but sometimes very expensive, the SIEM from IBM offers a wide range of scenarios in which the customers can suite and size their own infrastructures. IBM Qradar doesn't really needs to stack up againt its …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
It's in the middle of this chart, Splunk from my point of view it's still the best SIEM actually and Sentinel it's very easy to use.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
IBM Qradar is cheaper and also easy to use.
For splunk you need dedicated team of experts.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
As a part of core security service provider, we could not stand with the tools that are used as a generic data processor. The compliance, log reading and events are well managed in QRadar compared to other tools
Picus Security
Chose Picus Security
We use other vendors Verodin, AttackIQ, SafeBreach, Cymulate etc. All of them have their advantages and disadvantages. Please take a look at TrustRadius reviews of each product. I don’t want to go head to head for each product in this review. I select Picus because it's local …
Features
IBM Security QRadar SIEMPicus Security
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
8.5
Ratings
8% above category average
Picus Security
-
Ratings
Centralized event and log data collection9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Correlation8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment flexibility7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Data integration/API management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Security QRadar SIEMPicus Security
Small Businesses
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 8.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Security QRadar SIEMPicus Security
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Security QRadar SIEMPicus Security
Likelihood to Recommend
QRadar is very well suited on environments where there are not multiple tenants or domains, we do have success on this kind of scenario. IBM Security QRadar SIEM is less appropriate for environments with multiple tenants, specially when each tenant represent a different End Costumer (such as for MSSP companies), those environments require a high amount of rules and building blocks replications, since each tenant will have its own "BB definitions", servers, rules exception, etc. Also, some information, such as EPS count or EPS dropped are generated by QRadar's own log sources, which takes place on default domain, therefore users associated with different domain can not have access to those logs, even when the information is related to other domain's environment. For example, even if Event Collector 1 is associated to Domain A, the log informing its dropped EPS is generated by System notification, log source that must be associated to Default domain.
Read full review
If you want to analyze the full path focusing on the signatures it’s the best product in the market. If you want to test phishing, data exfiltration/DLP, DNS I don’t recommend Picus. Scenario based attacks also lacking. However Picus support is awesome and I like the development team. When we open a case, they’ll always return with the right answer
Read full review
Pros
  • Enables identification and prioritization of vulnerabilities in IT infrastructure for corrective action.
  • Facilitates security incident investigation and forensic analysis.
  • Provides a real-time view of security events, enabling immediate incident response.
  • Can integrate with external threat intelligence sources to enrich data and improve threat detection.
  • Enables the generation of detailed and customized reports.
Read full review
  • It has thousands of signatures and up-to-date attack vectors (It's the largest set in the market)
  • Attack vectors are mapped with existing vendors like Checkpoint and Mcafee, where you don't spend time finding out which cve mapped to which protection
  • Ability to focus/highlght solely new threats, it's superb for 0days and up-to-date protections. As there are always timing issue between updates and apply the updates on the products.
  • Blocked vs not blocked ratios on the dashboard with drill down menu specifiying the set of protections or signatures on the defensive measures
  • Already mapped mitre att&ck framework on the dasboard. SOC and analyst team using the Mitre framework.
  • Detection analytics enhance the analytics capabilities with pinpoint accuracy where to focus and how to prevent
  • Timeline and scheduled reports from the dashboard in flexible format
Read full review
Cons
  • Need to spend more time configuring the system to properly interpret and normalize different type of data collected from multiple resources.
  • While Rule creation QRadar uses that rules to detect security threats and generate alerts, but to creating and managing rules is bit complex & tedious work to complete.
  • IBM Security QRadar SIEM is excellent in handling large & complex systems that requires in-depth knowledge and extensive training to configure and maintain the system which includes upgrading, optimization of performance & issue troubleshooting.
Read full review
  • Visualization of network and the products
  • Complex/Scenario based attacks
  • Phishing tests
  • DNS and Data exfiltration attacks
  • Automatic action through the apis for the products on the path
  • Strategical and tactical reports for Cisos
  • Automatic SOAR entegration with already builtin playbooks
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
With the arrival of IBM Security QRadar SIEM at our company, we have a better vision of all the security needs that may arise, it is a very safe software to use that prevents threats from damaging our IT environment, it is impossible to change it for another software.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
As a grade I give 8 as QRadar is not easy to learn. It requires some time to master it. It also needs a team of people actively working on the product. Once you learn to use it the software works very well and it is easy to correlate and understand detected threats. It only takes time to learn how to use it well and configure it properly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Customer support is Good of IBM, While Using IBM QRadar its deployment is to slow and suddenly stop working and crashed we have contacted IBM Support and Rised a Ticket within a few minute we get call back from customer support and Query Resolved by them Fast And Rapid Support of Ibm
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
The training was very useful and the people who taught us were very knowledgeable. Although the software may initially seem difficult to learn they made things much easier for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The training was very useful and the people who taught us were very knowledgeable. Although the software may initially seem difficult to learn they made things much easier for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Initial patience is required to learn how to use the product, and it takes a dedicated team to use it. One person is not enough, and it's not enough to just set it up and check it once in a while. It has to be used daily and kept under control to be used effectively
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I would always recommend Splunk over IBM Security QRadar SIEM unless you're trying to save money or only onboarding and normalizing well known data sources. IBM Security QRadar SIEM doesn't seem to handle RBA and complicated, chaining correlation rules very effectively and if I had to write a custom add-on for custom data, I found it easier to do so in Splunk.
Read full review
We use other vendors Verodin, AttackIQ, SafeBreach, Cymulate etc. All of them have their advantages and disadvantages. Please take a look at TrustRadius reviews of each product. I don’t want to go head to head for each product in this
review. I select Picus because it's local startup company in our region. I like their support and engineering team. Support is marvelous. Product is giving what we expected from the product. Price is adequate. Reporting and dashboard is superb.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Like any cybersecurity product, any money you don't lose on a prevented attack is money that you saved
  • Most of the apps are free and provides great enrichment like User Behaviour Analytics
  • Top quality alerts gives enormous value to the "passive" data that flows into the infrastructure
Read full review
  • With Picus we have the tangible KPIs for the security
  • Detetcion and Prevention rates for the latest attacks are significantly increased
  • We work with many security vendors. We use picus scores and share specific outputs with the company in case of decreasing score rates where the development and product team analyzes their updates or product engines to increase the rates.
  • It helps our strategic plans where to focus and invest for the following years and planning/prioritizing the security budgets to specific highlighted areas
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Security QRadar SIEM Screenshots

Screenshot of QRadar SIEM Cloud native- Threat intelligence preview