IBM SSD vs. Kingston SSD

The tools on IBM SSD are easy to manipulate and setting the interface security during initial point is also very easy. Generating real time reports and the ability to access multiple data through IBM SSD is secure and simple. The monitoring capability and easy data mining system with great data visualization functions.

Incentivized

I think I cannot recommend it at all since our bad experience. There is no good scenario for an SSD which fails after 13 days of work.

• I/O Speed
• Ease of configuration
• Ease of replacement in case of failure

Incentivized

• KC3000 read/write speed
• Average price
• 4TB size

• Just the IBM SSD advanced tools learning.
• Handling big data when not familiar with the tool.
• Creating reliable reports across large project data.

Incentivized

• In my experience, it failed quickly, there is huge room to improve reliability...

The tools on IBM SSD are very flexible with excellent archiving capability and the notification tools with IBM SSD are very reliable. The IBM SSD interface is clean and all the features are very accessible and even the data threats management using IBM SSD is effective. Through the solution all the project data quality are easily managed.

Incentivized

Samsung PRO series never failed in our equipments this is why we thought SSDs today are very reliable. It is not true for the Kingstons

• Good Return on Investment as none have been replaced so far
• High response time from online portal for web users

Incentivized

• Negative impact, since it failed