TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Watson Speech to Text vs. Lilt

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Watson Speech to Text

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AIBM Watson Speech to Text supports conversion of audio and voice recordings to text in applications.N/A

    Lilt

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ALilt is an AI-powered language service provider (LSP). Lilt combines adaptive neural machine translation technology, an enterprise translation management system, and professional translators to allow organizations to scale their translation programs and improve the global customer experience. They purport to improve translation speed by 3-5x and reduce costs by 50% or more. Lilt HQ is based in San Francisco and is backed by VCs like Intel Capital, Sequoia, Redpoint, Zetta, and…N/A
    Pricing
    IBM Watson Speech to TextLilt
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Watson Speech to TextLilt
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    IBM Watson Speech to TextLilt
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Watson Speech to TextLilt
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    I would definitely recommend it, as it is one of the best speech-to-text applications available on the market. I gave 7 out of 10 because of the integration with third-party tools. Most organizations don't use the IBM ecosystem and are limited to a single environment, so they need to be easily integrated without being overly complex.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lilt Inc.
    Lilt is a great platform for translating and reviewing content for mainstream languages that are spoken by a large number of people such as Spanish, French, etc. in which case the machine translation tool does a great job of adding the appropriate fluency, grammar, and punctuations. The QA checks also likewise provide apt feedback with rarely any errors. The only shortfall for Lilt is when the content to be translated belongs to any non-mainstream languages (such as regional Indian state ones) and the most noticeable errors are thrown by the QA check tools which have several long-standing unfixed bugs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Low latency Real time meeting transcription
    • Meeting summary
    • Customer call summary
    • Automatic speech recognition
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lilt Inc.
    • Provide exact and fuzzy match feedback for translations
    • Provide step by step segmented workflow for translating
    • Great QA checks including Batch and Full to help detecting errors
    • Good machine translation feedback to help translators
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Integration with third party tools.
    • Processing time for longer meetings.
    • Catches the background sound/narration, but can be reduced using noise-cancelling channels.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lilt Inc.
    • Provide greater quality feedback for non-mainstream languages such as Indian regional
    • Improve punctuation and grammar fluency for non-mainstream languages
    • Fix long standing bug issues in QA check reporting mechanism
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    IBM Watson Speech-to-Text usability is excellent, and I highly recommend it as well. It is faster, takes accurate notes, and summarizes the points accurately. Also, it is very easy to navigate through the transcripts. If there is a long team meeting, one can jump to the information without wasting much time, as it also reduces manual work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lilt Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    It provides more flexible plans as compared to others. These plans are affordable for Small and medium-scale enterprises. They also offer free trial. IBM Watson has wider integration support with the help of API. It has very low latency in real time transcription. Also there is a formatting feature to Transcribe dates, times, currency etc as per the desired format
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lilt Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Improving productivity
    • Less communication gap
    • better customer services
    • global collaboration made easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lilt Inc.
    • Lilt is helping my organization localize its products to a lot more languages
    • Helps translating large content data like web pages with ease
    • Improves overall quality of work done and hence help gain more clients
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots